From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: property: fw_devlink: Do not use interrupt-parent directly
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:41:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241119154117.GA1537069-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241114195652.3068725-1-samuel.holland@sifive.com>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:56:49AM -0800, Samuel Holland wrote:
> commit 7f00be96f125 ("of: property: Add device link support for
> interrupt-parent, dmas and -gpio(s)") started adding device links for
> the interrupt-parent property. Later, commit f265f06af194 ("of:
> property: Fix fw_devlink handling of interrupts/interrupts-extended")
> added full support for parsing the interrupts and interrupts-extended
> properties, which includes looking up the node of the parent domain.
> This made the handler for the interrupt-parent property redundant.
>
> In fact, creating device links based solely on interrupt-parent is
> problematic, because it can create spurious cycles. A node may have
> this property without itself being an interrupt controller or consumer.
> For example, this property is often present in the root node or a /soc
> bus node to set the default interrupt parent for child nodes. However,
> it is incorrect for the bus to depend on the interrupt controller, as
> some of the bus's childre may not be interrupt consumers at all or may
typo
> have a different interrupt parent.
>
> Resolving these spurious dependency cycles can cause an incorrect probe
> order for interrupt controller drivers. This was observed on a RISC-V
> system with both an APLIC and IMSIC under /soc, where interrupt-parent
> in /soc points to the APLIC, and the APLIC msi-parent points to the
> IMSIC. fw_devlink found three dependency cycles and attempted to probe
> the APLIC before the IMSIC. After applying this patch, there were no
> dependency cycles and the probe order was correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
I assume this should go to stable? It needs Fixes tags.
Otherwise, the change makes sense to me.
> ---
>
> drivers/of/property.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 11b922fde7af..7bd8390f2fba 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -1213,7 +1213,6 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(iommus, "iommus", "#iommu-cells")
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(mboxes, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells")
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(io_channels, "io-channels", "#io-channel-cells")
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(io_backends, "io-backends", "#io-backend-cells")
> -DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(interrupt_parent, "interrupt-parent", NULL)
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(dmas, "dmas", "#dma-cells")
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(power_domains, "power-domains", "#power-domain-cells")
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(hwlocks, "hwlocks", "#hwlock-cells")
> @@ -1359,7 +1358,6 @@ static const struct supplier_bindings of_supplier_bindings[] = {
> { .parse_prop = parse_mboxes, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_io_channels, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_io_backends, },
> - { .parse_prop = parse_interrupt_parent, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_dmas, .optional = true, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_power_domains, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_hwlocks, },
> --
> 2.45.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-19 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-14 19:56 [PATCH] of: property: fw_devlink: Do not use interrupt-parent directly Samuel Holland
2024-11-14 20:24 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-11-15 9:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-19 15:41 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2024-11-19 16:46 ` Samuel Holland
2024-11-19 17:49 ` Rob Herring
2024-11-20 22:58 ` Samuel Holland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241119154117.GA1537069-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox