From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: willy@infradead.org, liam.howlett@oracle.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, mjguzik@gmail.com, oliver.sang@intel.com,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, david@redhat.com,
peterx@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
paulmck@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
hdanton@sina.com, hughd@google.com, minchan@google.com,
jannh@google.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
souravpanda@google.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
surenb@google.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] move per-vma lock into vm_area_struct
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:08:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241120000826.335387-1-surenb@google.com> (raw)
Back when per-vma locks were introduces, vm_lock was moved out of
vm_area_struct in [1] because of the performance regression caused by
false cacheline sharing. Recent investigation [2] revealed that the
regressions is limited to a rather old Broadwell microarchitecture and
even there it can be mitigated by disabling adjacent cacheline
prefetching, see [3].
Splitting single logical structure into multiple ones leads to more
complicated management, extra pointer dereferences and overall less
maintainable code. When that split-away part is a lock, it complicates
things even further. With no performance benefits, there are no reasons
for this split. Merging the vm_lock back into vm_area_struct also allows
vm_area_struct to use SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU later in this patchset.
This patchset:
1. moves vm_lock back into vm_area_struct, aligning it at the cacheline
boundary and changing the cache to be cacheline-aligned to minimize
cacheline sharing;
2. changes vm_area_struct initialization to mark new vma as detached until
it is inserted into vma tree;
3. changes vm_area_struct cache to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU to allow for their
reuse and to minimize call_rcu() calls.
Pagefault microbenchmarks do not show noticeable performance change.
Changes since v3 [4]
- Added SOBs, per Lorenzo Stoakes and Davidlohr Bueso;
- Replaced vma write-locking in vma_mark_attached() with memory barriers to
order accesses to vma->detached vs vm_mm/vm_start/vm_end
Patch applies over mm-unstable
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230227173632.3292573-34-surenb@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZsQyI%2F087V34JoIt@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJuCfpEisU8Lfe96AYJDZ+OM4NoPmnw9bP53cT_kbfP_pR+-2g@mail.gmail.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241117080931.600731-1-surenb@google.com/
Suren Baghdasaryan (5):
mm: introduce vma_start_read_locked{_nested} helpers
mm: move per-vma lock into vm_area_struct
mm: mark vma as detached until it's added into vma tree
mm: make vma cache SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU
docs/mm: document latest changes to vm_lock
Documentation/mm/process_addrs.rst | 10 ++-
include/linux/mm.h | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/linux/mm_types.h | 19 ++---
kernel/fork.c | 88 +++++++-------------
mm/memory.c | 17 ++--
mm/userfaultfd.c | 22 ++---
mm/vma.c | 8 +-
mm/vma.h | 2 +
tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h | 55 +++++-------
9 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
base-commit: 5a7056135bb69da2ce0a42eb8c07968c1331777b
--
2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-20 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-20 0:08 Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2024-11-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mm: introduce vma_start_read_locked{_nested} helpers Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-11-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mm: move per-vma lock into vm_area_struct Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-11-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mm: mark vma as detached until it's added into vma tree Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-11-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mm: make vma cache SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-11-20 4:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-11-20 6:37 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-11-20 10:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-11-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] docs/mm: document latest changes to vm_lock Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241120000826.335387-1-surenb@google.com \
--to=surenb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@google.com \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=souravpanda@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox