public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Gobbi <rodrigo.gobbi.7@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com
Cc: ~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix broken code when cflag is used
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:08:22 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241124200934.156252-1-rodrigo.gobbi.7@gmail.com> (raw)

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Gobbi <rodrigo.gobbi.7@gmail.com>
---
As noticed at [1], hal_com.c is not compiling with -DDBG_RX_SIGNAL_DISPLAY_RAW_DATA due
the changes at [2] (a few statements were not replaced with the new struct).
A little discussion was made at [1] too about how useful this cflag was or if the
code under the cflag should be deleted. I think there is no harm to keep those things
as is since we can easily fix the error.
Tks and regards.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/f61d8272-4af3-40d6-a333-e7731c3fc5ae@stanley.mountain/T/#mffa281a89e67c609db9b125878d5b8d090776812
[2] "staging: rtl8723bs: Rework 'struct _ODM_Phy_Status_Info_' coding style.", commit ec57f8641fbca07bbb61a75bd4760fd7aef86860
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c
index 95fb38283c58..63bf6f034f61 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c
@@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ void rtw_store_phy_info(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *prframe)
 	struct hal_com_data *pHalData =  GET_HAL_DATA(padapter);
 	struct rx_pkt_attrib *pattrib = &prframe->u.hdr.attrib;
 
-	struct odm_phy_info *pPhyInfo  = (PODM_PHY_INFO_T)(&pattrib->phy_info);
+	struct odm_phy_info *pPhyInfo  = (struct odm_phy_info *)(&pattrib->phy_info);
 	struct rx_raw_rssi *psample_pkt_rssi = &padapter->recvpriv.raw_rssi_info;
 
 	psample_pkt_rssi->data_rate = pattrib->data_rate;
@@ -919,8 +919,8 @@ void rtw_store_phy_info(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *prframe)
 		psample_pkt_rssi->mimo_signal_strength[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->rx_mimo_signal_strength[rf_path];
 		psample_pkt_rssi->mimo_signal_quality[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->rx_mimo_signal_quality[rf_path];
 		if (!isCCKrate) {
-			psample_pkt_rssi->ofdm_pwr[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->RxPwr[rf_path];
-			psample_pkt_rssi->ofdm_snr[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->RxSNR[rf_path];
+			psample_pkt_rssi->ofdm_pwr[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->rx_pwr[rf_path];
+			psample_pkt_rssi->ofdm_snr[rf_path] = pPhyInfo->rx_snr[rf_path];
 		}
 	}
 }
-- 
2.47.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-11-24 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-24 20:08 Rodrigo Gobbi [this message]
2024-11-25 13:37 ` [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix broken code when cflag is used Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241124200934.156252-1-rodrigo.gobbi.7@gmail.com \
    --to=rodrigo.gobbi.7@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox