From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sparc/pci: Make pci_poke_lock a raw_spinlock_t.
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:53:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241125085314.1iSDFulg@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7656395b-58fc-4874-a9f3-6d934e2ef7ee@roeck-us.net>
The pci_poke_lock is used underneath of the pci_lock. The pci_lock is a
low level lock used by the core code in sections with disabled
insterrupts. Therefore the pci_poke_lock must be a raw_spinlock_t.
Make pci_poke_lock a raw_spinlock_t.
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/7656395b-58fc-4874-a9f3-6d934e2ef7ee@roeck-us.net
Fixes: 560af5dc839ee ("lockdep: Enable PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING with PROVE_LOCKING.")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
On 2024-11-23 08:27:08 [-0800], Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Is this a problem with the test or with the platform ?
platform. The patch below should fix it. It makes no difference unless
used on PREEMPT_RT. Since sparc does not support it I made the fixes
where the default option changed.
Could you test it, please? I don't have a even a compiler for sparc
right now.
arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
index 50a0927a84a6f..12e0b78cded55 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
@@ -42,14 +42,14 @@ volatile int pci_poke_in_progress;
volatile int pci_poke_cpu = -1;
volatile int pci_poke_faulted;
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pci_poke_lock);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(pci_poke_lock);
void pci_config_read8(u8 *addr, u8 *ret)
{
unsigned long flags;
u8 byte;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
pci_poke_cpu = smp_processor_id();
pci_poke_in_progress = 1;
pci_poke_faulted = 0;
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void pci_config_read8(u8 *addr, u8 *ret)
pci_poke_cpu = -1;
if (!pci_poke_faulted)
*ret = byte;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
}
void pci_config_read16(u16 *addr, u16 *ret)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ void pci_config_read16(u16 *addr, u16 *ret)
unsigned long flags;
u16 word;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
pci_poke_cpu = smp_processor_id();
pci_poke_in_progress = 1;
pci_poke_faulted = 0;
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ void pci_config_read16(u16 *addr, u16 *ret)
pci_poke_cpu = -1;
if (!pci_poke_faulted)
*ret = word;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
}
void pci_config_read32(u32 *addr, u32 *ret)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ void pci_config_read32(u32 *addr, u32 *ret)
unsigned long flags;
u32 dword;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
pci_poke_cpu = smp_processor_id();
pci_poke_in_progress = 1;
pci_poke_faulted = 0;
@@ -107,14 +107,14 @@ void pci_config_read32(u32 *addr, u32 *ret)
pci_poke_cpu = -1;
if (!pci_poke_faulted)
*ret = dword;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
}
void pci_config_write8(u8 *addr, u8 val)
{
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
pci_poke_cpu = smp_processor_id();
pci_poke_in_progress = 1;
pci_poke_faulted = 0;
@@ -126,14 +126,14 @@ void pci_config_write8(u8 *addr, u8 val)
: "memory");
pci_poke_in_progress = 0;
pci_poke_cpu = -1;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
}
void pci_config_write16(u16 *addr, u16 val)
{
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
pci_poke_cpu = smp_processor_id();
pci_poke_in_progress = 1;
pci_poke_faulted = 0;
@@ -145,14 +145,14 @@ void pci_config_write16(u16 *addr, u16 val)
: "memory");
pci_poke_in_progress = 0;
pci_poke_cpu = -1;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
}
void pci_config_write32(u32 *addr, u32 val)
{
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
pci_poke_cpu = smp_processor_id();
pci_poke_in_progress = 1;
pci_poke_faulted = 0;
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ void pci_config_write32(u32 *addr, u32 val)
: "memory");
pci_poke_in_progress = 0;
pci_poke_cpu = -1;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_poke_lock, flags);
}
static int ofpci_verbose;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-25 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 15:45 [PATCH 0/1] lockdep: Enable PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING with PROVE_LOCKING Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-10-09 15:45 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-10-09 16:50 ` Waiman Long
2024-10-09 22:47 ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-22 21:53 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-23 16:27 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Guenter Roeck
2024-11-25 8:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2024-11-25 17:01 ` [PATCH] sparc/pci: Make pci_poke_lock a raw_spinlock_t Guenter Roeck
2024-11-25 17:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-25 17:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-25 18:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-25 19:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-25 19:33 ` Waiman Long
2024-11-25 20:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-25 20:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-25 20:54 ` Waiman Long
2024-11-25 21:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-25 21:29 ` Waiman Long
2024-11-25 21:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-25 22:33 ` Waiman Long
2024-11-26 11:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-26 16:59 ` Waiman Long
2024-11-27 15:39 ` Andreas Larsson
2024-11-27 16:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-27 16:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-27 17:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-27 23:47 ` Waiman Long
2024-11-28 0:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-28 0:31 ` Waiman Long
2024-11-28 1:17 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-11-28 1:55 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241125085314.1iSDFulg@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox