From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] media: i2c: imx219: make HBLANK r/w to allow longer exposures
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:16:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241126121640.GE5461@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241125-imx219_fixes-v3-2-434fc0b541c8@ideasonboard.com>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 08:36:26PM +0530, Jai Luthra wrote:
> From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
>
> The HBLANK control was read-only, and always configured such
> that the sensor HTS register was 3448. This limited the maximum
> exposure time that could be achieved to around 1.26 secs.
>
> Make HBLANK read/write so that the line time can be extended,
> and thereby allow longer exposures (and slower frame rates).
> Retain the overall HTS setting when changing modes rather than
> resetting it to a default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> index f98aad74fe584a18e2fe7126f92bf294762a54e3..970e6362d0ae3a9078daf337155e83d637bc1ca1 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> @@ -76,8 +76,10 @@
>
> #define IMX219_VBLANK_MIN 32
>
> -/* HBLANK control - read only */
> -#define IMX219_PPL_DEFAULT 3448
> +/* HBLANK control range */
Just drop the comment, and drop the blank lines, this belongs to the
"V_TIMING internal" section.
> +#define IMX219_PPL_MIN 0x0d78
Why PPL and not HTS ?
> +#define IMX219_PPL_MAX 0x7ff0
> +#define IMX219_REG_HTS CCI_REG16(0x0162)
The min/max should go below the register definition.
>
> #define IMX219_REG_LINE_LENGTH_A CCI_REG16(0x0162)
> #define IMX219_REG_X_ADD_STA_A CCI_REG16(0x0164)
> @@ -422,6 +424,10 @@ static int imx219_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> cci_write(imx219->regmap, IMX219_REG_VTS,
> format->height + ctrl->val, &ret);
> break;
> + case V4L2_CID_HBLANK:
> + cci_write(imx219->regmap, IMX219_REG_HTS,
> + format->width + ctrl->val, &ret);
> + break;
> case V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN_RED:
> cci_write(imx219->regmap, IMX219_REG_TESTP_RED,
> ctrl->val, &ret);
> @@ -496,12 +502,10 @@ static int imx219_init_controls(struct imx219 *imx219)
> V4L2_CID_VBLANK, IMX219_VBLANK_MIN,
> IMX219_VTS_MAX - mode->height, 1,
> mode->vts_def - mode->height);
> - hblank = IMX219_PPL_DEFAULT - mode->width;
> + hblank = IMX219_PPL_MIN - mode->width;
> imx219->hblank = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(ctrl_hdlr, &imx219_ctrl_ops,
> V4L2_CID_HBLANK, hblank, hblank,
The minimum and maximum are identical, is this intentional ?
> 1, hblank);
> - if (imx219->hblank)
> - imx219->hblank->flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
> exposure_max = mode->vts_def - 4;
> exposure_def = (exposure_max < IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT) ?
> exposure_max : IMX219_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT;
> @@ -817,6 +821,10 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *format;
> struct v4l2_rect *crop;
> unsigned int bin_h, bin_v;
> + u32 prev_hts;
> +
> + format = v4l2_subdev_state_get_format(state, 0);
> + prev_hts = format->width + imx219->hblank->val;
>
> mode = v4l2_find_nearest_size(supported_modes,
> ARRAY_SIZE(supported_modes),
> @@ -824,8 +832,6 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> fmt->format.width, fmt->format.height);
>
> imx219_update_pad_format(imx219, mode, &fmt->format, fmt->format.code);
> -
> - format = v4l2_subdev_state_get_format(state, 0);
> *format = fmt->format;
>
> /*
> @@ -861,13 +867,18 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> exposure_max, imx219->exposure->step,
> exposure_def);
> /*
> - * Currently PPL is fixed to IMX219_PPL_DEFAULT, so hblank
> - * depends on mode->width only, and is not changeble in any
> - * way other than changing the mode.
> + * Retain PPL setting from previous mode so that the
Rename PPL to HTS here too.
> + * line time does not change on a mode change.
> + * Limits have to be recomputed as the controls define
> + * the blanking only, so PPL values need to have the
> + * mode width subtracted.
> */
> - hblank = IMX219_PPL_DEFAULT - mode->width;
> - __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->hblank, hblank, hblank, 1,
> - hblank);
> + hblank = prev_hts - mode->width;
> + __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->hblank,
> + IMX219_PPL_MIN - mode->width,
> + IMX219_PPL_MAX - mode->width,
> + 1, IMX219_PPL_MIN - mode->width);
> + __v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl(imx219->hblank, hblank);
> }
>
> return 0;
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-26 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-25 15:06 [PATCH v3 0/3] media: i2c: imx219: Fixes for blanking and pixel rate Jai Luthra
2024-11-25 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] media: i2c: imx219: Correct the minimum vblanking value Jai Luthra
2024-11-25 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] media: i2c: imx219: make HBLANK r/w to allow longer exposures Jai Luthra
2024-11-26 12:16 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2024-11-26 13:21 ` Dave Stevenson
2024-11-26 13:30 ` Jai Luthra
2024-11-26 13:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-11-25 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] media: i2c: imx219: Scale the pixel rate for analog binning Jai Luthra
2024-11-25 18:40 ` Dave Stevenson
2024-11-26 8:54 ` Jai Luthra
2024-11-26 14:36 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-11-27 9:37 ` Jai Luthra
2024-12-10 13:32 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-10 13:41 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241126121640.GE5461@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox