Re: [PATCH 3/3] cxl/test: Simulate an x86 Low Memory Hole for tests

[Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>]

On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:51:54 +0100
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Simulate an x86 Low Memory Hole for the CXL tests by changing
> mock_cfmws[0] range size to 768MB and CXL Endpoint Decoder HPA range size
> to 1GB and have get_cfmws_range_start() return two different addresses
> which depend on whether the passed device is real or mock.
> 
> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com>

> diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c b/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c
> index 050725afa45d..b61c3d78fed3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static struct {
>  			.restrictions = ACPI_CEDT_CFMWS_RESTRICT_TYPE3 |
>  					ACPI_CEDT_CFMWS_RESTRICT_VOLATILE,
>  			.qtg_id = FAKE_QTG_ID,
> -			.window_size = SZ_256M * 4UL,
> +			.window_size = SZ_256M * 3UL,
This is changing the test whether or not we have ARCH_LOW_MEMORY_HOLE.
Doesn't that result in failures on arm64 etc?

Jonathan

>  		},
>  		.target = { 0 },
>  	},
> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static void mock_init_hdm_decoder(struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
>  	struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled;
>  	struct cxl_switch_decoder *cxlsd;
>  	struct cxl_port *port, *iter;
> -	const int size = SZ_512M;
> +	const int size = SZ_1G;
>  	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
>  	struct cxl_dport *dport;
>  	struct device *dev;