From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf tools: Avoid unaligned pointer operations
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:03:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241128010325.946897-1-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
The sample data is 64-bit aligned basically but raw data starts with
32-bit length field and data follows. In perf_event__synthesize_sample
it treats the sample data as a 64-bit array. And it needs some trick
to update the raw data properly.
But it seems some compilers are not happy with this and the program dies
siliently. I found the sample parsing test failed without any messages
on affected systems.
Let's update the code to use a 32-bit pointer directly and make sure the
result is 64-bit aligned again. No functional changes intended.
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
v2) use '%' instead of '/' to check alignment
tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c b/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c
index a58444c4aed1f1ea..6923b0d5efede4a7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c
@@ -1686,12 +1686,16 @@ int perf_event__synthesize_sample(union perf_event *event, u64 type, u64 read_fo
}
if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) {
- u.val32[0] = sample->raw_size;
- *array = u.val64;
- array = (void *)array + sizeof(u32);
+ u32 *array32 = (void *)array;
+
+ *array32 = sample->raw_size;
+ array32++;
+
+ memcpy(array32, sample->raw_data, sample->raw_size);
+ array = (void *)(array32 + (sample->raw_size / sizeof(u32)));
- memcpy(array, sample->raw_data, sample->raw_size);
- array = (void *)array + sample->raw_size;
+ /* make sure the array is 64-bit aligned */
+ BUG_ON(((long)array) % sizeof(u64));
}
if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
--
2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-28 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-28 1:03 Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-11-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v2] perf tools: Avoid unaligned pointer operations Liang, Kan
2024-12-13 20:57 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241128010325.946897-1-namhyung@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox