public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Prundeanu <cpru@amazon.com>
To: <cpru@amazon.com>
Cc: <abuehaze@amazon.com>, <alisaidi@amazon.com>,
	<benh@kernel.crashing.org>, <blakgeof@amazon.com>,
	<csabac@amazon.com>, <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	<doebel@amazon.com>, <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	<joseph.salisbury@oracle.com>, <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<peterz@infradead.org>, <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Disable PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY and move them to sysctl
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 04:32:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241128103236.22777-1-cpru@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241125113535.88583-1-cpru@amazon.com>

On 2024-11-26, K Prateek Nayak wrote:

> Would it be possible to use the perf-tool built there to collect
> the scheduling stats for MySQL benchmark runs on both v6.5 and v6.8 and
> share the output of "perf sched stats diff" and the two perf.data files
> recorded?

I'll add this to the list of my next tests. Thank you for mentioning it!


On 2024-11-26, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:

> SUT kernel arm64 (mysql-8.4.0)
> (2) 6.12.0-rc4                -12.9%
> (3) 6.12.0-rc4 NO_PLACE_LAG   +6.4%		
> (4) v6.12-rc4  SCHED_BATCH    +10.8%

This is very interesting; our setups are close, yet I have not seen any 
feature or policy combination that performs above the 6.5 CFS baseline.
I look forward to seeing your results with the repro when it's ready.

Did you only use NO_PLACE_LAG or was it together with NO_RUN_TO_PARITY?

Was SCHED_BATCH used with the default feature set (all enabled)?

Which distro/version did you use for the SUT?

> Maybe a difference in our test setup can explain the different test results:
>
> I use:
>
> HammerDB Load Generator <-> MySQL SUT
> 192 VCPUs               <-> 16 VCPUs
> 
> Virtual users: 256
> Warehouse count: 64
> 3 min rampup
> 10 min test run time
> performance data: NOPM (New Operations Per Minute)
>
> So I have 256 'connection' tasks running on the 16 SUT VCPUS.

My setup:

SUT     - 16 vCPUs, 32 GB RAM
Loadgen - 64 vCPU, 128 GB RAM (anything large enough to not be a 
 bottleneck should work)

Virtual users:  4 x vCPUs = 64
Warehouses:     24
Rampup:         5 min
Test runtime:   20 min x 10 times, each on 4 different SUT/Loadgen pairs
Value recorded: geometric_mean(NOPM)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-28 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-17  5:19 [PATCH 0/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Disable PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY and move them to sysctl Cristian Prundeanu
2024-10-17  5:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Disable PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY Cristian Prundeanu
2024-10-17  5:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Move PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY to sysctl Cristian Prundeanu
2024-10-17  9:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Disable PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY and move them " Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-17 18:19   ` Prundeanu, Cristian
2024-10-18  7:07     ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-10-18  9:54     ` Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2024-11-14 20:10 ` Joseph Salisbury
2024-11-19 10:29   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-11-25 11:35 ` Cristian Prundeanu
2024-11-26  3:58   ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-11-26 15:12   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-11-28 10:32   ` Cristian Prundeanu [this message]
2024-11-29 10:12     ` Dietmar Eggemann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-19  2:30 Prundeanu, Cristian
2024-10-24  8:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2024-10-25 14:43   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-29  4:57     ` Cristian Prundeanu
2024-10-30 10:21       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-11-01 13:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-04 10:19       ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-04 10:34         ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-01-19 11:04 [GIT PULL] sched/urgent for v6.13 Borislav Petkov
2025-01-28 23:09 [PATCH 0/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Disable PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY and move them to sysctl Cristian Prundeanu
2025-02-11  3:27 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-02-12  5:41   ` Cristian Prundeanu
2025-02-12  9:43     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241128103236.22777-1-cpru@amazon.com \
    --to=cpru@amazon.com \
    --cc=abuehaze@amazon.com \
    --cc=alisaidi@amazon.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=blakgeof@amazon.com \
    --cc=csabac@amazon.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=doebel@amazon.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=joseph.salisbury@oracle.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox