From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] of: Add #address-cells/#size-cells in the device-tree root empty node
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:48:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241202154800.GA2617722-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202131522.142268-6-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 02:15:17PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> On systems where ACPI is enabled or when a device-tree is not passed to
> the kernel by the bootloader, a device-tree root empty node is created.
> This device-tree root empty node does not have the #address-cells and
> the #size-cells properties
>
> This leads to the use of the default address cells and size cells values
> which are defined in the code to 1 for the address cells value and 1 for
> the size cells value.
>
> According to the devicetree specification and the OpenFirmware standard
> (IEEE 1275-1994) the default value for #address-cells should be 2.
>
> Also, according to the devicetree specification, the #address-cells and
> the #size-cells are required properties in the root node.
>
> The device tree compiler already uses 2 as default value for address
> cells and 1 for size cells. The powerpc PROM code also uses 2 as default
> value for address cells and 1 for size cells. Modern implementation
> should have the #address-cells and the #size-cells properties set and
> should not rely on default values.
>
> On x86, this root empty node is used and the code default values are
> used.
>
> In preparation of the support for device-tree overlay on PCI devices
> feature on x86 (i.e. the creation of the PCI root bus device-tree node),
> the default value for #address-cells needs to be updated. Indeed, on
> x86_64, addresses are on 64bits and the upper part of an address is
> needed for correct address translations. On x86_32 having the default
> value updated does not lead to issues while the upper part of a 64-bit
> value is zero.
>
> Changing the default value for all architectures may break device-tree
> compatibility. Indeed, existing dts file without the #address-cells
> property set in the root node will not be compatible with this
> modification.
>
> Instead of updating default values, add both required #address-cells
> and #size-cells properties in the device-tree empty node.
>
> Use 2 for both properties value in order to fully support 64-bit
> addresses and sizes on systems using this empty root node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/empty_root.dts | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This also fixes unittest hitting a warning added for 6.13. So
I've applied this patch as a fix.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-02 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 13:15 [PATCH v4 0/6] Add support for the PCI host bridge device-tree node creation Herve Codina
2024-12-02 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] driver core: Introduce device_{add,remove}_of_node() Herve Codina
2024-12-04 21:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-12-05 7:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-05 7:33 ` Herve Codina
2024-12-02 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] PCI: of: Use device_{add,remove}_of_node() to attach of_node to existing device Herve Codina
2024-12-02 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] PCI: of_property: Add support for NULL pdev in of_pci_set_address() Herve Codina
2024-12-02 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] PCI: of_property: Constify parameter in of_pci_get_addr_flags() Herve Codina
2024-12-02 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] of: Add #address-cells/#size-cells in the device-tree root empty node Herve Codina
2024-12-02 15:48 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2024-12-02 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] PCI: of: Create device-tree PCI host bridge node Herve Codina
2024-12-04 21:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-12-05 7:37 ` Herve Codina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241202154800.GA2617722-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox