From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 17/39] rxrpc: Don't need barrier for ->tx_bottom and ->acks_hard_ack
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 07:46:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241204074710.990092-18-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241204074710.990092-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
We don't need a barrier for the ->tx_bottom value (which indicates the
lowest sequence still in the transmission queue) and the ->acks_hard_ack
value (which tracks the DATA packets hard-ack'd by the latest ACK packet
received and thus indicates which DATA packets can now be discarded) as the
app thread doesn't use either value as a reference to memory to access.
Rather, the app thread merely uses these as a guide to how much space is
available in the transmission queue
Change the code to use READ/WRITE_ONCE() instead.
Also, change rxrpc_check_tx_space() to use the same value for tx_bottom
throughout.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c | 8 +++++---
net/rxrpc/txbuf.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
index 786c1fb1369a..467c9402882e 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
@@ -94,9 +94,11 @@ static int rxrpc_wait_to_be_connected(struct rxrpc_call *call, long *timeo)
*/
static bool rxrpc_check_tx_space(struct rxrpc_call *call, rxrpc_seq_t *_tx_win)
{
+ rxrpc_seq_t tx_bottom = READ_ONCE(call->tx_bottom);
+
if (_tx_win)
- *_tx_win = call->tx_bottom;
- return call->tx_prepared - call->tx_bottom < 256;
+ *_tx_win = tx_bottom;
+ return call->tx_prepared - tx_bottom < 256;
}
/*
@@ -138,7 +140,7 @@ static int rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window_waitall(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
rtt = 2;
timeout = rtt;
- tx_start = smp_load_acquire(&call->acks_hard_ack);
+ tx_start = READ_ONCE(call->acks_hard_ack);
for (;;) {
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c b/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c
index 8b7c854ed3d7..0cc8f49d69a9 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c
@@ -214,14 +214,14 @@ void rxrpc_shrink_call_tx_buffer(struct rxrpc_call *call)
while ((txb = list_first_entry_or_null(&call->tx_buffer,
struct rxrpc_txbuf, call_link))) {
- hard_ack = smp_load_acquire(&call->acks_hard_ack);
+ hard_ack = call->acks_hard_ack;
if (before(hard_ack, txb->seq))
break;
if (txb->seq != call->tx_bottom + 1)
rxrpc_see_txbuf(txb, rxrpc_txbuf_see_out_of_step);
ASSERTCMP(txb->seq, ==, call->tx_bottom + 1);
- smp_store_release(&call->tx_bottom, call->tx_bottom + 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(call->tx_bottom, call->tx_bottom + 1);
list_del_rcu(&txb->call_link);
trace_rxrpc_txqueue(call, rxrpc_txqueue_dequeue);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-04 7:46 [PATCH net-next v2 00/39] rxrpc: Implement jumbo DATA transmission and RACK-TLP David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/39] ktime: Add us_to_ktime() David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/39] rxrpc: Fix handling of received connection abort David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/39] rxrpc: Use umin() and umax() rather than min_t()/max_t() where possible David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/39] rxrpc: Clean up Tx header flags generation handling David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/39] rxrpc: Don't set the MORE-PACKETS rxrpc wire header flag David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/39] rxrpc: Show stats counter for received reason-0 ACKs David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/39] rxrpc: Request an ACK on impending Tx stall David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/39] rxrpc: Use a large kvec[] in rxrpc_local rather than every rxrpc_txbuf David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/39] rxrpc: Implement path-MTU probing using padded PING ACKs (RFC8899) David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/39] rxrpc: Separate the packet length from the data length in rxrpc_txbuf David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/39] rxrpc: Prepare to be able to send jumbo DATA packets David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/39] rxrpc: Add a tracepoint to show variables pertinent to jumbo packet size David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/39] rxrpc: Fix CPU time starvation in I/O thread David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 14/39] rxrpc: Fix injection of packet loss David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 15/39] rxrpc: Only set DF=1 on initial DATA transmission David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 16/39] rxrpc: Timestamp DATA packets before transmitting them David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` David Howells [this message]
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 18/39] rxrpc: Implement progressive transmission queue struct David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 19/39] rxrpc: call->acks_hard_ack is now the same call->tx_bottom, so remove it David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 20/39] rxrpc: Replace call->acks_first_seq with tracking of the hard ACK point David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 21/39] rxrpc: Display stats about jumbo packets transmitted and received David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 22/39] rxrpc: Adjust names and types of congestion-related fields David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 23/39] rxrpc: Use the new rxrpc_tx_queue struct to more efficiently process ACKs David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 24/39] rxrpc: Store the DATA serial in the txqueue and use this in RTT calc David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 25/39] rxrpc: Don't use received skbuff timestamps David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 26/39] rxrpc: Generate rtt_min David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 27/39] rxrpc: Adjust the rxrpc_rtt_rx tracepoint David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 28/39] rxrpc: Display userStatus in rxrpc_rx_ack trace David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 29/39] rxrpc: Fix the calculation and use of RTO David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 30/39] rxrpc: Fix initial resend timeout David Howells
2024-12-04 7:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 31/39] rxrpc: Send jumbo DATA packets David Howells
2024-12-04 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next v2 32/39] rxrpc: Don't allocate a txbuf for an ACK transmission David Howells
2024-12-04 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next v2 33/39] rxrpc: Use irq-disabling spinlocks between app and I/O thread David Howells
2024-12-04 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next v2 34/39] rxrpc: Tidy up the ACK parsing a bit David Howells
2024-12-04 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next v2 35/39] rxrpc: Add a reason indicator to the tx_data tracepoint David Howells
2024-12-04 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next v2 36/39] rxrpc: Add a reason indicator to the tx_ack tracepoint David Howells
2024-12-04 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next v2 37/39] rxrpc: Manage RTT per-call rather than per-peer David Howells
2024-12-04 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next v2 38/39] rxrpc: Fix request for an ACK when cwnd is minimum David Howells
2024-12-04 7:47 ` [PATCH net-next v2 39/39] rxrpc: Implement RACK/TLP to deal with transmission stalls [RFC8985] David Howells
2024-12-09 22:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/39] rxrpc: Implement jumbo DATA transmission and RACK-TLP patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241204074710.990092-18-dhowells@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox