From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 427891DE891; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 07:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733471949; cv=none; b=CM0s/ZJmuIPOqQLDt1pcQt9ljVPsFawlOvJHg1nIJ1tmMXTnIKiBX3Z/6PTWe1WlSy8/BrWbtKUBbrdnOmAxYxk5PzE0BzOg3QIL3qJrvL7SOGzScKqi4zG0AfbBLEuq4ejgYv+zhsgjYsggUZAI1v2uPR6h2FA9xJjJf9XR3dg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733471949; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uh1GtNgeJXD3jjxW/WbErm5HG89T+2j4ihV8ipDenzw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oXdMHAWKZ50Z4DkFI/GLAyavQNnobl2S0Ww09EXHDDiC45HvLQNdezdCmlr9pRZI1uEogbYGToiHZd6qDqLGnSQeMamkhr+kArdmIGvj9h8xwNStHkAcNjrA+pERUoyK8n/VCLhM94xa8fqO3eT9JoScnuajIyj0l+FzeqSTYGY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=kf10tiZj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="kf10tiZj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1733471947; x=1765007947; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=uh1GtNgeJXD3jjxW/WbErm5HG89T+2j4ihV8ipDenzw=; b=kf10tiZjl6IxDl/yTFUpvOa83oYPJWIpizA/buJvsVpm4omcT1m9rzm/ WrRdWc7tDjvj0CMuavvFzVVn9O/qwPBnnd90iqmbLLg361Fv4ewJTZHFD yVvCQqbPgJuqYYnMpB9k6HfPdjOYvWVDrlAPmQWrw9dr8d1m4BKCLrKAI rI+XO/3IQYWwnWHPW+Q/M92LUfps8CtjVXxo0STt9JJQYz092l/Mp1WkW 63SNKejb68ZZ7BKfFNRnaGeRNWp9BHAT3GliXBPLvN8cF8JhZv1h1kV5h FEfV6avNqL4xU8x3A+kqHs7gFEKaW5sgU/PaudEKAb6vdhRdM/QYJBjRl w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: JSPMxw3LQkS29yOlxdd94Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HY9T8fFhS0aNVxVnzDTG4g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11277"; a="45192754" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,212,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="45192754" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Dec 2024 23:59:06 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: JvQ4gwdtSrS4ez3aatitGA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tB2L8oKAREmMv3tfZ4NGxg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,212,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="94144258" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 82a3f569d0cb) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa010.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2024 23:59:03 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 82a3f569d0cb with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tJTEq-0000pj-1e; Fri, 06 Dec 2024 07:59:00 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 15:58:50 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Igor Belwon , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Chanwoo Choi , Alim Akhtar , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Conor Dooley Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] clk: samsung: Introduce Exynos990 clock controller driver Message-ID: <202412061549.wyFF9u8X-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241205193423.783815-4-igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241205193423.783815-4-igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org> Hi Igor, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on krzk/for-next] [also build test ERROR on krzk-dt/for-next clk/clk-next linus/master v6.13-rc1 next-20241205] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Igor-Belwon/clk-samsung-clk-pll-Add-support-for-pll_-0717x-0718x-0732x/20241206-043559 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241205193423.783815-4-igor.belwon%40mentallysanemainliners.org patch subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] clk: samsung: Introduce Exynos990 clock controller driver config: arm64-randconfig-004-20241206 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241206/202412061549.wyFF9u8X-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 592c0fe55f6d9a811028b5f3507be91458ab2713) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241206/202412061549.wyFF9u8X-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412061549.wyFF9u8X-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos990.c:13:10: fatal error: 'dt-bindings/clock/exynos990.h' file not found 13 | #include | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. vim +13 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos990.c 12 > 13 #include 14 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki