From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, hbathini@linux.ibm.com, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com,
shuah@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix fill_link_info selftest on powerpc
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:27:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241209065720.234344-1-skb99@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
With CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE enabled on powerpc, ftrace_location_range
returns ftrace location for bpf_fentry_test1 at offset of 4 bytes from
function entry. This is because branch to _mcount function is at offset
of 4 bytes in function profile sequence.
To fix this, add entry_offset of 4 bytes while verifying the address for
kprobe entry address of bpf_fentry_test1 in verify_perf_link_info in
selftest, when CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE is enabled.
Disassemble of bpf_fentry_test1:
c000000000e4b080 <bpf_fentry_test1>:
c000000000e4b080: a6 02 08 7c mflr r0
c000000000e4b084: b9 e2 22 4b bl c00000000007933c <_mcount>
c000000000e4b088: 01 00 63 38 addi r3,r3,1
c000000000e4b08c: b4 07 63 7c extsw r3,r3
c000000000e4b090: 20 00 80 4e blr
When CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE [1] is enabled, these function profile
sequence is moved out of line with an unconditional branch at offset 0.
So, the test works without altering the offset for
'CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE && CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE' case.
Disassemble of bpf_fentry_test1:
c000000000f95190 <bpf_fentry_test1>:
c000000000f95190: 00 00 00 60 nop
c000000000f95194: 01 00 63 38 addi r3,r3,1
c000000000f95198: b4 07 63 7c extsw r3,r3
c000000000f9519c: 20 00 80 4e blr
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241030070850.1361304-13-hbathini@linux.ibm.com/
Fixes: 23cf7aa539dc ("selftests/bpf: Add selftest for fill_link_info")
Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c | 4 ++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c | 13 ++++++++++---
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
index d50cbd804..e59af2aa6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
@@ -171,6 +171,10 @@ static void test_kprobe_fill_link_info(struct test_fill_link_info *skel,
/* See also arch_adjust_kprobe_addr(). */
if (skel->kconfig->CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT)
entry_offset = 4;
+ if (skel->kconfig->CONFIG_PPC64 &&
+ skel->kconfig->CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE &&
+ !skel->kconfig->CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE)
+ entry_offset = 4;
err = verify_perf_link_info(link_fd, type, kprobe_addr, 0, entry_offset);
ASSERT_OK(err, "verify_perf_link_info");
} else {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c
index 6afa83475..fac33a14f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_fill_link_info.c
@@ -6,13 +6,20 @@
#include <stdbool.h>
extern bool CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT __kconfig __weak;
+extern bool CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE __kconfig __weak;
+extern bool CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE __kconfig __weak;
+extern bool CONFIG_PPC64 __kconfig __weak;
-/* This function is here to have CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
- * used and added to object BTF.
+/* This function is here to have CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT,
+ * CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE, CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE,
+ * CONFIG_PPC6 used and added to object BTF.
*/
int unused(void)
{
- return CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT ? 0 : 1;
+ return CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT ||
+ CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE ||
+ CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE ||
+ CONFIG_PPC64 ? 0 : 1;
}
SEC("kprobe")
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-09 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 6:57 Saket Kumar Bhaskar [this message]
2024-12-09 22:00 ` [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix fill_link_info selftest on powerpc patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241209065720.234344-1-skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--to=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox