From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C591D1F37A9; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734546217; cv=none; b=n20im3O+8O9j959IJbjRX3gozyk/R/gQ19POQz7FTY/FhVhaCr+J22/H88Wae70sAnwWnIEfmgsvoh2v/kv6e98oaLnzWP+ap+38KDV6hkIf3n5Zfa0BRMvRQIumCa6JoAsX3CiAE1fOwGaHYZML4R8CTT7ixB3oRE7ucpHbH/k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734546217; c=relaxed/simple; bh=c6eelvsTAfT5X3Bvf7o8FkL3v/cSWYPHNIXU0zEvr9o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tl6SBxQHM8q7GEm2MiYPJa7ohhzuvBD9W95f2aOg5Il3kjnm2jXs59aGsdqos/YZuuIaYuzULuQgwehpdHCiBk9Iu7dTmJOonOmJMe6ZFeCJDstMY+NcMjDL8HIm2IAknSdtFg7JnV6uchMaeBlO25IDpUpugqUpJwQ4dQk+CEI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SAy9W0Bg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SAy9W0Bg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C2E3C4CECD; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:23:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734546217; bh=c6eelvsTAfT5X3Bvf7o8FkL3v/cSWYPHNIXU0zEvr9o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SAy9W0Bg4qqIUGVmO1nEwLMRKyEcrXkH3PUeZvy9IZDboYxSh/bp4NiBnqWnDcdRB AGNmGwzolzSEWZN5k5hwKp50KiN7KoplZcI8soIdh62MJCTGmh0P/deU89A0HP988m 1ONgti1RI5X/DsaDF0rmHimjGOk+QvFmRxYV5IelT7H34Uw0GkSg67fRecJF/h2HE3 ZVaLdRtq4WxNK2YnN1j/UWl6R1xz1NbNvlpwN/gdp+h+laPdumshxGmf9LfSubjl7n eMBtJ+rOI/9Kd4WeBdwg0iRdbSB9+kUNro5hQIO+7MNfgux+ovJhY4V5V5984UN35j YKmQV2JlPnv/w== Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:23:33 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Brian Cain Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , "linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org" , "patches@lists.linux.dev" , "llvm@lists.linux.dev" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hexagon: Disable constant extender optimization for LLVM prior to 19.1.0 Message-ID: <20241218182333.GB2948182@ax162> References: <20241121-hexagon-disable-constant-expander-pass-v2-1-1a92e9afb0f4@kernel.org> <20241217174425.GA2651946@ax162> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Brian, On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 04:19:23AM +0000, Brian Cain wrote: > > I'm sorry. You should not have to send these changes to Linus. I should have > > carried it in my tree and proposed it to Linus. > > > > I'll do that, if you don't mind. > > I see it's landed. Sorry, all. I'll resolve to do a better job here. As Nick said, no worries, these things happen. If going straight to Linus gave the impression that you did something wrong or inadequate, I apologize, as that was not the intention. I seem to recall even recently him saying that he does not mind applying patches directly from the mailing list and bypassing the maintainer/subsystem when it fixes an issue (cannot find the exact message I am thinking of but [1] is also good). Since this patch is small and limited in scope, I figured it was not worth any more pings. That said, consistent ownership of arch/hexagon patches would not be a bad thing going forward :) [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/CAHk-=wgQhFPvneqAVXjUZDq=ahpATdgfg6LZ9n07MSSUGkQWuA@mail.gmail.com/ Cheers, Nathan