public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] x86,tlb: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 23:06:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241222040717.3096835-9-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241222040717.3096835-1-riel@surriel.com>

Instead of doing a system-wide TLB flush from arch_tlbbatch_flush,
queue up asynchronous, targeted flushes from arch_tlbbatch_add_pending.

This also allows us to avoid adding the CPUs of processes using broadcast
flushing to the batch->cpumask, and will hopefully further reduce TLB
flushing from the reclaim and compaction paths.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 12 +++---------
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c               | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h
index 1ad56eb3e8a8..f9a17edf63ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch {
 	 * the PFNs being flushed..
 	 */
 	struct cpumask cpumask;
+	bool used_invlpgb;
 };
 
 #endif /* _ARCH_X86_TLBBATCH_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index a59f56c9b355..87f9a3725d95 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -294,21 +294,15 @@ static inline u64 inc_mm_tlb_gen(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	return atomic64_inc_return(&mm->context.tlb_gen);
 }
 
-static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
-					     struct mm_struct *mm,
-					     unsigned long uaddr)
-{
-	inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
-	cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
-	mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL);
-}
-
 static inline void arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	flush_tlb_mm(mm);
 }
 
 extern void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch);
+extern void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
+					     struct mm_struct *mm,
+					     unsigned long uaddr);
 
 static inline bool pte_flags_need_flush(unsigned long oldflags,
 					unsigned long newflags,
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 11ecffa26567..0482042e011c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -1614,12 +1614,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__flush_tlb_all);
 void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
 {
 	struct flush_tlb_info *info;
-
 	int cpu = get_cpu();
 
-	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB)) {
-		invlpgb_flush_all_nonglobals();
+	/* If we issued (asynchronous) INVLPGB flushes, wait for them here. */
+	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB) && batch->used_invlpgb) {
 		tlbsync();
+		migrate_enable();
+		batch->used_invlpgb = false;
 		goto out_put_cpu;
 	}
 
@@ -1646,6 +1647,32 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
 	put_cpu();
 }
 
+void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
+					     struct mm_struct *mm,
+					     unsigned long uaddr)
+{
+	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB) && mm->context.broadcast_asid) {
+		u16 asid = mm->context.broadcast_asid;
+		/*
+		 * Queue up an asynchronous invalidation. The corresponding
+		 * TLBSYNC is done in arch_tlbbatch_flush(), and must be done
+		 * on the same CPU.
+		 */
+		if (!batch->used_invlpgb) {
+			batch->used_invlpgb = true;
+			migrate_disable();
+		}
+		invlpgb_flush_user_nr(kern_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, 0);
+		/* Do any CPUs supporting INVLPGB need PTI? */
+		if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
+			invlpgb_flush_user_nr(user_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, 0);
+	} else {
+		inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
+		cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
+	}
+	mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL);
+}
+
 /*
  * Blindly accessing user memory from NMI context can be dangerous
  * if we're in the middle of switching the current user task or
-- 
2.47.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-22  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-22  4:06 [RFC PATCH 00/10] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Rik van Riel
2024-12-22  4:06 ` [PATCH 01/10] Add X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB definition Rik van Riel
2024-12-22  4:06 ` [PATCH 02/10] x86,tlb: get INVLPGB count max from CPUID Rik van Riel
2024-12-22 11:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-22 14:39     ` Rik van Riel
2024-12-22  4:06 ` [PATCH 03/10] x86,mm: add INVLPGB support code Rik van Riel
2024-12-22 11:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-22 21:24     ` Rik van Riel
2024-12-22  4:06 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86,mm: use INVLPGB for kernel TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2024-12-22 11:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-22 15:12     ` Rik van Riel
2024-12-24 18:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-22 11:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-22  4:06 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86,tlb: use INVLPGB in flush_tlb_all Rik van Riel
2024-12-22 11:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-22  4:06 ` [PATCH 06/10] x86,mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing Rik van Riel
2024-12-22 11:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-22  4:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86,mm: enable broadcast TLB invalidation for multi-threaded processes Rik van Riel
2024-12-22 11:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-22 22:45     ` Rik van Riel
2024-12-22  4:06 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2024-12-22  4:06 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86/mm: enable AMD translation cache extensions Rik van Riel
2024-12-22 11:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-22 15:37     ` Rik van Riel
2024-12-24 18:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-22  4:06 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB Rik van Riel
2024-12-22 11:11 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-22 15:06   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241222040717.3096835-9-riel@surriel.com \
    --to=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox