From: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, yury.norov@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
nik.borisov@suse.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/5] x86/cpufeatures: Use AWK to generate {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 23:07:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250106070727.3211006-5-xin@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106070727.3211006-1-xin@zytor.com>
Generate macros {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET in the newly added AWK
script that generates the required and disabled feature mask header.
Suggested-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@zytor.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v3:
* Use '1U' instead of '1' in feature mask shifting (Andrew Cooper).
* Checking NCAPINTS isn't necessary anymore. It was needed when these
macros had to be manually updated, but now if cpufeatures.h changes
this header will be regenerated (Brian Gerst).
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 69 -------------------------------
arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk | 9 +++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 077a5bbd1cc5..b829a12eda8a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -55,75 +55,6 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32];
#define test_cpu_cap(c, bit) \
arch_test_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)((c)->x86_capability))
-/*
- * There are 32 bits/features in each mask word. The high bits
- * (selected with (bit>>5) give us the word number and the low 5
- * bits give us the bit/feature number inside the word.
- * (1UL<<((bit)&31) gives us a mask for the feature_bit so we can
- * see if it is set in the mask word.
- */
-#define CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(maskname, word, bit) \
- (((bit)>>5)==(word) && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & maskname##word ))
-
-/*
- * {REQUIRED,DISABLED}_MASK_CHECK below may seem duplicated with the
- * following BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() check but when NCAPINTS gets changed, all
- * header macros which use NCAPINTS need to be changed. The duplicated macro
- * use causes the compiler to issue errors for all headers so that all usage
- * sites can be corrected.
- */
-#define REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET(feature_bit) \
- ( CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 0, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 1, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 2, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 3, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 4, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 5, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 6, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 7, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 8, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 9, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 10, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 11, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 12, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 13, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 14, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 15, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 16, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 17, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 18, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 19, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 20, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 21, feature_bit) || \
- REQUIRED_MASK_CHECK || \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 22))
-
-#define DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(feature_bit) \
- ( CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 0, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 1, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 2, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 3, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 4, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 5, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 6, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 7, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 8, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 9, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 10, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 11, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 12, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 13, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 14, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 15, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 16, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 17, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 18, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 19, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 20, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 21, feature_bit) || \
- DISABLED_MASK_CHECK || \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 22))
-
#define cpu_has(c, bit) \
(__builtin_constant_p(bit) && REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 1 : \
test_cpu_cap(c, bit))
diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk b/arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk
index dfac56a697fc..01e47b31e187 100755
--- a/arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk
+++ b/arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk
@@ -74,7 +74,14 @@ END {
for (i = 0; i < ncapints; i++)
printf "#define %s_MASK%d\t0x%08xU\n", s, i, masks[i];
- printf "#define %s_MASK_CHECK BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != %d)\n\n", s, ncapints;
+ printf "\n#define %s_MASK_BIT_SET(x)\t\t\t\\\n", s;
+ printf "\t((\t\t\t\t\t";
+ for (i = 0; i < ncapints; i++) {
+ if (masks[i])
+ printf "\t\\\n\t\t((x) >> 5) == %2d ? %s_MASK%d :", i, s, i;
+ }
+ printf " 0\t\\\n";
+ printf "\t) & (1U << ((x) & 31)))\n\n";
}
printf "#endif /* _ASM_X86_FEATUREMASKS_H */\n";
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-06 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-06 7:07 [PATCH v5 0/5] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks Xin Li (Intel)
2025-01-06 7:07 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] x86/cpufeatures: Add {required,disabled} feature configs Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-14 21:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-15 10:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-02-15 14:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-15 14:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-02-15 14:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-15 14:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-02-15 14:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-01-06 7:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] x86/cpufeatures: Generate a feature mask header based on build config Xin Li (Intel)
2025-01-06 7:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] x86/cpufeatures: Remove {disabled,required}-features.h Xin Li (Intel)
2025-01-06 7:07 ` Xin Li (Intel) [this message]
2025-01-06 7:07 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] x86/cpufeatures: Add the CPU feature bit for MSR immediate form instructions Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-22 16:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-22 18:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-24 7:30 ` Xin Li
2025-02-24 17:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-02-11 2:25 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks Xin Li
2025-02-23 10:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-25 17:10 ` Xin Li
2025-02-25 17:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-25 17:54 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-02-25 18:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-25 18:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-02-25 18:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-25 18:37 ` Xin Li
2025-02-25 20:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250106070727.3211006-5-xin@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox