From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>,
Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>, Dohyun Kim <dohyunkim@google.com>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 22/22] selftests/bpf: Add tests for rqspinlock
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 06:00:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107140004.2732830-23-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107140004.2732830-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Introduce selftests that trigger AA, ABBA deadlocks, and test the edge
case where the held locks table runs out of entries, since we then
fallback to the timeout as the final line of defense. Also exercise
verifier's AA detection where applicable.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/res_spin_lock.c | 103 ++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/irq.c | 53 ++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/res_spin_lock.c | 189 +++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/res_spin_lock_fail.c | 226 ++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 571 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/res_spin_lock.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/res_spin_lock.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/res_spin_lock_fail.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/res_spin_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/res_spin_lock.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..547f76381d3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/res_spin_lock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+
+#include "res_spin_lock.skel.h"
+#include "res_spin_lock_fail.skel.h"
+
+static void test_res_spin_lock_failure(void)
+{
+ RUN_TESTS(res_spin_lock_fail);
+}
+
+static volatile int skip;
+
+static void *spin_lock_thread(void *arg)
+{
+ int err, prog_fd = *(u32 *) arg;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+ .repeat = 10000,
+ );
+
+ while (!skip) {
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+ ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run retval");
+ }
+ pthread_exit(arg);
+}
+
+static void test_res_spin_lock_success(void)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+ .repeat = 1,
+ );
+ struct res_spin_lock *skel;
+ pthread_t thread_id[16];
+ int prog_fd, i, err;
+ void *ret;
+
+ skel = res_spin_lock__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "res_spin_lock__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+ /* AA deadlock */
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.res_spin_lock_test);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "error");
+ ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "retval");
+ /* AA deadlock missed detection due to OoO unlock */
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.res_spin_lock_test_ooo_missed_AA);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "error");
+ ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "retval");
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.res_spin_lock_test_held_lock_max);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "error");
+ ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "retval");
+
+ /* Multi-threaded ABBA deadlock. */
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.res_spin_lock_test_AB);
+ for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+ int err;
+
+ err = pthread_create(&thread_id[i], NULL, &spin_lock_thread, &prog_fd);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create"))
+ goto end;
+ }
+
+ topts.repeat = 1000;
+ int fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.res_spin_lock_test_BA);
+ while (!topts.retval && !err && !skel->bss->err) {
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(fd, &topts);
+ }
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->err, -EDEADLK, "timeout err");
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "err");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, -EDEADLK, "timeout");
+
+ skip = true;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(pthread_join(thread_id[i], &ret), "pthread_join"))
+ goto end;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, &prog_fd, "ret == prog_fd"))
+ goto end;
+ }
+end:
+ res_spin_lock__destroy(skel);
+ return;
+}
+
+void test_res_spin_lock(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("res_spin_lock_success"))
+ test_res_spin_lock_success();
+ if (test__start_subtest("res_spin_lock_failure"))
+ test_res_spin_lock_failure();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/irq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/irq.c
index b0b53d980964..3d4fee83a5be 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/irq.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/irq.c
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ extern void bpf_local_irq_save(unsigned long *) __weak __ksym;
extern void bpf_local_irq_restore(unsigned long *) __weak __ksym;
extern int bpf_copy_from_user_str(void *dst, u32 dst__sz, const void *unsafe_ptr__ign, u64 flags) __weak __ksym;
+struct bpf_res_spin_lock lockA __hidden SEC(".data.A");
+struct bpf_res_spin_lock lockB __hidden SEC(".data.B");
+
SEC("?tc")
__failure __msg("arg#0 doesn't point to an irq flag on stack")
int irq_save_bad_arg(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
@@ -441,4 +444,54 @@ int irq_ooo_refs_array(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
return 0;
}
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("cannot restore irq state out of order")
+int irq_ooo_lock_cond_inv(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ unsigned long flags1, flags2;
+
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave(&lockA, &flags1))
+ return 0;
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave(&lockB, &flags2)) {
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockA, &flags1);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockB, &flags1);
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockA, &flags2);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("function calls are not allowed")
+int irq_wrong_kfunc_class_1(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ unsigned long flags1;
+
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave(&lockA, &flags1))
+ return 0;
+ /* For now, bpf_local_irq_restore is not allowed in critical section,
+ * but this test ensures error will be caught with kfunc_class when it's
+ * opened up. Tested by temporarily permitting this kfunc in critical
+ * section.
+ */
+ bpf_local_irq_restore(&flags1);
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockA, &flags1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("function calls are not allowed")
+int irq_wrong_kfunc_class_2(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ unsigned long flags1, flags2;
+
+ bpf_local_irq_save(&flags1);
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave(&lockA, &flags2))
+ return 0;
+ bpf_local_irq_restore(&flags2);
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockA, &flags1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/res_spin_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/res_spin_lock.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6d98e8f99e04
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/res_spin_lock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+#define EDEADLK 35
+#define ETIMEDOUT 110
+
+struct arr_elem {
+ struct bpf_res_spin_lock lock;
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 64);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, struct arr_elem);
+} arrmap SEC(".maps");
+
+struct bpf_res_spin_lock lockA __hidden SEC(".data.A");
+struct bpf_res_spin_lock lockB __hidden SEC(".data.B");
+
+SEC("tc")
+int res_spin_lock_test(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem1, *elem2;
+ int r;
+
+ elem1 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem1)
+ return -1;
+ elem2 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem2)
+ return -1;
+
+ r = bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem1->lock);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+ if (!bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem2->lock)) {
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&elem2->lock);
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&elem1->lock);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&elem1->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int res_spin_lock_test_ooo_missed_AA(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem1, *elem2, *elem3;
+ int r;
+
+ elem1 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem1)
+ return 1;
+ elem2 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){1});
+ if (!elem2)
+ return 2;
+ elem3 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){1});
+ if (!elem3)
+ return 3;
+ if (elem3 != elem2)
+ return 4;
+
+ r = bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem1->lock);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem2->lock)) {
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&elem1->lock);
+ return 5;
+ }
+ /* Held locks shows elem1 but should be elem2 */
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&elem1->lock);
+ /* Distinct lookup gives a fresh id for elem3,
+ * but it's the same address as elem2...
+ */
+ r = bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem3->lock);
+ if (!r) {
+ /* Something is broken, how?? */
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&elem3->lock);
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&elem2->lock);
+ return 6;
+ }
+ /* We should get -ETIMEDOUT, as AA detection will fail to catch this. */
+ if (r != -ETIMEDOUT) {
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&elem2->lock);
+ return 7;
+ }
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&elem2->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int res_spin_lock_test_AB(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ int r;
+
+ r = bpf_res_spin_lock(&lockA);
+ if (r)
+ return !r;
+ /* Only unlock if we took the lock. */
+ if (!bpf_res_spin_lock(&lockB))
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&lockB);
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&lockA);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int err;
+
+SEC("tc")
+int res_spin_lock_test_BA(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ int r;
+
+ r = bpf_res_spin_lock(&lockB);
+ if (r)
+ return !r;
+ if (!bpf_res_spin_lock(&lockA))
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&lockA);
+ else
+ err = -EDEADLK;
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&lockB);
+ return -EDEADLK;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int res_spin_lock_test_held_lock_max(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_res_spin_lock *locks[48] = {};
+ struct arr_elem *e;
+ u64 time_beg, time;
+ int ret = 0, i;
+
+ _Static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(((struct rqspinlock_held){}).locks) == 32,
+ "RES_NR_HELD assumed to be 32");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 34; i++) {
+ int key = i;
+
+ /* We cannot pass in i as it will get spilled/filled by the compiler and
+ * loses bounds in verifier state.
+ */
+ e = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &key);
+ if (!e)
+ return 1;
+ locks[i] = &e->lock;
+ }
+
+ for (; i < 48; i++) {
+ int key = i - 2;
+
+ /* We cannot pass in i as it will get spilled/filled by the compiler and
+ * loses bounds in verifier state.
+ */
+ e = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &key);
+ if (!e)
+ return 1;
+ locks[i] = &e->lock;
+ }
+
+ time_beg = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
+ for (i = 0; i < 34; i++) {
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock(locks[i]))
+ goto end;
+ }
+
+ /* Trigger AA, after exhausting entries in the held lock table. This
+ * time, only the timeout can save us, as AA detection won't succeed.
+ */
+ if (!bpf_res_spin_lock(locks[34])) {
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(locks[34]);
+ ret = 1;
+ goto end;
+ }
+
+end:
+ for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(locks[i]);
+ time = bpf_ktime_get_ns() - time_beg;
+ /* Time spent should be easily above our limit (1/2 s), since AA
+ * detection won't be expedited due to lack of held lock entry.
+ */
+ return ret ?: (time > 1000000000 / 2 ? 0 : 1);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/res_spin_lock_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/res_spin_lock_fail.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..dc402497a99e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/res_spin_lock_fail.c
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "bpf_experimental.h"
+
+struct arr_elem {
+ struct bpf_res_spin_lock lock;
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, struct arr_elem);
+} arrmap SEC(".maps");
+
+long value;
+
+struct bpf_spin_lock lock __hidden SEC(".data.A");
+struct bpf_res_spin_lock res_lock __hidden SEC(".data.B");
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("point to map value or allocated object")
+int res_spin_lock_arg(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem;
+
+ elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem)
+ return 0;
+ bpf_res_spin_lock((struct bpf_res_spin_lock *)bpf_core_cast(&elem->lock, struct __sk_buff));
+ bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("AA deadlock detected")
+int res_spin_lock_AA(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem;
+
+ elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem)
+ return 0;
+ bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem->lock);
+ bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("AA deadlock detected")
+int res_spin_lock_cond_AA(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem;
+
+ elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem)
+ return 0;
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem->lock))
+ return 0;
+ bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("unlock of different lock")
+int res_spin_lock_mismatch_1(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem;
+
+ elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem)
+ return 0;
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem->lock))
+ return 0;
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&res_lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("unlock of different lock")
+int res_spin_lock_mismatch_2(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem;
+
+ elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem)
+ return 0;
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock(&res_lock))
+ return 0;
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&elem->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("unlock of different lock")
+int res_spin_lock_irq_mismatch_1(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem;
+ unsigned long f1;
+
+ elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem)
+ return 0;
+ bpf_local_irq_save(&f1);
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock(&res_lock))
+ return 0;
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&res_lock, &f1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("unlock of different lock")
+int res_spin_lock_irq_mismatch_2(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem;
+ unsigned long f1;
+
+ elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem)
+ return 0;
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave(&res_lock, &f1))
+ return 0;
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&res_lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__success
+int res_spin_lock_ooo(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem;
+
+ elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem)
+ return 0;
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock(&res_lock))
+ return 0;
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock(&elem->lock)) {
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&res_lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&elem->lock);
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock(&res_lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__success
+int res_spin_lock_ooo_irq(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem;
+ unsigned long f1, f2;
+
+ elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem)
+ return 0;
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave(&res_lock, &f1))
+ return 0;
+ if (bpf_res_spin_lock_irqsave(&elem->lock, &f2)) {
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&res_lock, &f1);
+ /* We won't have a unreleased IRQ flag error here. */
+ return 0;
+ }
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&elem->lock, &f2);
+ bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&res_lock, &f1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("off 1 doesn't point to 'struct bpf_res_spin_lock' that is at 0")
+int res_spin_lock_bad_off(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem;
+
+ elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem)
+ return 0;
+ bpf_res_spin_lock((void *)&elem->lock + 1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("R1 doesn't have constant offset. bpf_res_spin_lock has to be at the constant offset")
+int res_spin_lock_var_off(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct arr_elem *elem;
+ u64 val = value;
+
+ elem = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &(int){0});
+ if (!elem) {
+ // FIXME: Only inline assembly use in assert macro doesn't emit
+ // BTF definition.
+ bpf_throw(0);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ bpf_assert_range(val, 0, 40);
+ bpf_res_spin_lock((void *)&value + val);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("map 'res_spin.bss' has no valid bpf_res_spin_lock")
+int res_spin_lock_no_lock_map(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ bpf_res_spin_lock((void *)&value + 1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("local 'kptr' has no valid bpf_res_spin_lock")
+int res_spin_lock_no_lock_kptr(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct { int i; } *p = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*p));
+
+ if (!p)
+ return 0;
+ bpf_res_spin_lock((void *)p);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 13:59 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/22] Resilient Queued Spin Lock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/22] locking: Move MCS struct definition to public header Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/22] locking: Move common qspinlock helpers to a private header Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/22] locking: Allow obtaining result of arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/22] locking: Copy out qspinlock.c to rqspinlock.c Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/22] rqspinlock: Add rqspinlock.h header Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/22] rqspinlock: Drop PV and virtualization support Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/22] rqspinlock: Add support for timeouts Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 17:14 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/22] rqspinlock: Protect pending bit owners from stalls Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 17:14 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 19:54 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 2:19 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:13 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/22] rqspinlock: Protect waiters in queue " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 3:38 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:42 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/22] rqspinlock: Protect waiters in trylock fallback " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/22] rqspinlock: Add deadlock detection and recovery Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 16:06 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:19 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09 0:32 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 12/22] rqspinlock: Add basic support for CONFIG_PARAVIRT Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 16:27 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:32 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09 0:48 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09 2:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09 2:58 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09 3:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09 3:46 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09 3:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09 3:58 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/22] rqspinlock: Add helper to print a splat on timeout or deadlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 14/22] rqspinlock: Add macros for rqspinlock usage Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 16:55 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09 1:11 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09 3:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09 4:09 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 15/22] rqspinlock: Add locktorture support Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 16/22] rqspinlock: Add entry to Makefile, MAINTAINERS Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 17/22] bpf: Convert hashtab.c to rqspinlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 18/22] bpf: Convert percpu_freelist.c " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 19/22] bpf: Convert lpm_trie.c " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 20/22] bpf: Introduce rqspinlock kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 10:23 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-08 10:23 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-08 10:44 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 21/22] bpf: Implement verifier support for rqspinlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2025-01-07 23:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/22] Resilient Queued Spin Lock Linus Torvalds
2025-01-08 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-08 20:12 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-01-08 21:06 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 21:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-09 13:59 ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09 21:13 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09 21:18 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250107140004.2732830-23-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brho@google.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dohyunkim@google.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox