public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
	Dohyun Kim <dohyunkim@google.com>,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/22] rqspinlock: Protect pending bit owners from stalls
Date: Tue,  7 Jan 2025 05:59:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107140004.2732830-9-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107140004.2732830-1-memxor@gmail.com>

The pending bit is used to avoid queueing in case the lock is
uncontended, and has demonstrated benefits for the 2 contender scenario,
esp. on x86. In case the pending bit is acquired and we wait for the
locked bit to disappear, we may get stuck due to the lock owner not
making progress. Hence, this waiting loop must be protected with a
timeout check.

To perform a graceful recovery once we decide to abort our lock
acquisition attempt in this case, we must unset the pending bit since we
own it. All waiters undoing their changes and exiting gracefully allows
the lock word to be restored to the unlocked state once all participants
(owner, waiters) have been recovered, and the lock remains usable.
Hence, set the pending bit back to zero before returning to the caller.

Introduce a lockevent (rqspinlock_lock_timeout) to capture timeout
event statistics.

Reviewed-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h  |  2 +-
 kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h |  5 +++++
 kernel/locking/rqspinlock.c       | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h
index 8ed266f4e70b..5c996a82e75f 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h
@@ -19,6 +19,6 @@ struct qspinlock;
  */
 #define RES_DEF_TIMEOUT (NSEC_PER_SEC / 2)
 
-extern void resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, u64 timeout);
+extern int resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, u64 timeout);
 
 #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_RQSPINLOCK_H */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
index 97fb6f3f840a..c5286249994d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h
@@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ LOCK_EVENT(lock_use_node4)	/* # of locking ops that use 4th percpu node */
 LOCK_EVENT(lock_no_node)	/* # of locking ops w/o using percpu node    */
 #endif /* CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS */
 
+/*
+ * Locking events for Resilient Queued Spin Lock
+ */
+LOCK_EVENT(rqspinlock_lock_timeout)	/* # of locking ops that timeout	*/
+
 /*
  * Locking events for rwsem
  */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rqspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/rqspinlock.c
index 815feb24d512..dd305573db13 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rqspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rqspinlock.c
@@ -138,12 +138,12 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct qnode, qnodes[_Q_MAX_NODES]);
  * contended             :    (*,x,y) +--> (*,0,0) ---> (*,0,1) -'  :
  *   queue               :         ^--'                             :
  */
-void __lockfunc resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, u64 timeout)
+int __lockfunc resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, u64 timeout)
 {
 	struct mcs_spinlock *prev, *next, *node;
 	struct rqspinlock_timeout ts;
+	int idx, ret = 0;
 	u32 old, tail;
-	int idx;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= (1U << _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS));
 
@@ -201,8 +201,25 @@ void __lockfunc resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32
 	 * clear_pending_set_locked() implementations imply full
 	 * barriers.
 	 */
-	if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
-		smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->locked, !VAL);
+	if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK) {
+		RES_RESET_TIMEOUT(ts);
+		smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->locked, !VAL || RES_CHECK_TIMEOUT(ts, ret));
+	}
+
+	if (ret) {
+		/*
+		 * We waited for the locked bit to go back to 0, as the pending
+		 * waiter, but timed out. We need to clear the pending bit since
+		 * we own it. Once a stuck owner has been recovered, the lock
+		 * must be restored to a valid state, hence removing the pending
+		 * bit is necessary.
+		 *
+		 * *,1,* -> *,0,*
+		 */
+		clear_pending(lock);
+		lockevent_inc(rqspinlock_lock_timeout);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * take ownership and clear the pending bit.
@@ -211,7 +228,7 @@ void __lockfunc resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32
 	 */
 	clear_pending_set_locked(lock);
 	lockevent_inc(lock_pending);
-	return;
+	return 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * End of pending bit optimistic spinning and beginning of MCS
@@ -362,5 +379,6 @@ void __lockfunc resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32
 	 * release the node
 	 */
 	__this_cpu_dec(qnodes[0].mcs.count);
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
-- 
2.43.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-07 13:59 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/22] Resilient Queued Spin Lock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/22] locking: Move MCS struct definition to public header Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/22] locking: Move common qspinlock helpers to a private header Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/22] locking: Allow obtaining result of arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/22] locking: Copy out qspinlock.c to rqspinlock.c Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/22] rqspinlock: Add rqspinlock.h header Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/22] rqspinlock: Drop PV and virtualization support Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/22] rqspinlock: Add support for timeouts Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 17:14     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2025-01-07 14:51   ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/22] rqspinlock: Protect pending bit owners from stalls Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 17:14     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 19:17       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 19:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-07 19:54           ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08  2:19   ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:13     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/22] rqspinlock: Protect waiters in queue " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08  3:38   ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:42     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/22] rqspinlock: Protect waiters in trylock fallback " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/22] rqspinlock: Add deadlock detection and recovery Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 16:06   ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:19     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09  0:32       ` Waiman Long
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 12/22] rqspinlock: Add basic support for CONFIG_PARAVIRT Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 16:27   ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:32     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09  0:48       ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09  2:42         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09  2:58           ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09  3:37             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09  3:46               ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09  3:53                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09  3:58                   ` Waiman Long
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/22] rqspinlock: Add helper to print a splat on timeout or deadlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 14/22] rqspinlock: Add macros for rqspinlock usage Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 16:55   ` Waiman Long
2025-01-08 20:41     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09  1:11       ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09  3:30         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-09  4:09           ` Waiman Long
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 15/22] rqspinlock: Add locktorture support Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 16/22] rqspinlock: Add entry to Makefile, MAINTAINERS Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 17/22] bpf: Convert hashtab.c to rqspinlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 18/22] bpf: Convert percpu_freelist.c " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 19/22] bpf: Convert lpm_trie.c " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 20/22] bpf: Introduce rqspinlock kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 10:23   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-08 10:23   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-08 10:44   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 21/22] bpf: Implement verifier support for rqspinlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 22/22] selftests/bpf: Add tests " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-07 23:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/22] Resilient Queued Spin Lock Linus Torvalds
2025-01-08  9:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-08 20:12     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 20:30       ` Linus Torvalds
2025-01-08 21:06         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-08 21:30         ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-09 13:59       ` Waiman Long
2025-01-09 21:13         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-01-09 21:18           ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250107140004.2732830-9-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brho@google.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dohyunkim@google.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox