From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FD33192598; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 07:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736235621; cv=none; b=UHOHC09wMXYQCRdpkkulmr2psMOQo1WsbG8Ri/qDQ1o0Pa1376Rp8+dYG2ps58oHeFRtc7Xz9c1GmzeJMLBPSNVTf1Md2CK1Uc3r6zVHy3ogkVpk49GynnHzo04bTIu5F39YvqU9rdx0EPgeSsYh68YbIWq1cvbJYkLVjPa8wPc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736235621; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3JjAFVFRbXwuyLvXfM+2gtbMFEhlrEWhviQRtfgGLPk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GgJ6t4/612xNk/EJQo9jjA3Mnuh1xcY9K2MgX/7pomCjfbOt61pr0b068QPhGytTH0lWkP1LCOq/oUkdH7qi4Xj2Wby4cLBimW3wsLV7QoT96/+5eWgdxDmexAHprlMGf37tW8YcIl+tDfX8om3fqpk/Yi12SeLnApQrkL3DQ1U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NXE6kCXI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NXE6kCXI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1736235617; x=1767771617; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=3JjAFVFRbXwuyLvXfM+2gtbMFEhlrEWhviQRtfgGLPk=; b=NXE6kCXIXo60Sqgra8HqNjuxigZi32rZ1ykHZPwbx/10IZ1LFHMtCUJS EZL5IhzMLgIOS1eMTs3wyv9zUNfIvZaKrBIjEj1pELUCTGgrSbOjXDLks IkS7EKivuD005/598RGOPwcG/G/KQvW9xjhR4jUSRVfJcYe2FMRUM6bVj Dmn5sY8hoOtECG2JV5wYxyWEVZvbIj8hzLTIpdy9OsjK0J1xcHjMenZ+w +LNt03MjKvrij7pB7ldiZyZPYJQ6h38sjy677hIAmRamUkg9vGwNmwfWD taMNTuXHjDEGcWVArUeb9QjjDzD/YbeUKm+2zwUNgmsHlieDp2CzhrGn5 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: S7A1gVBrS/OAnkKCcMZmdw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ji3ytScgR9e+YYKptdVyEw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11307"; a="35637721" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,294,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="35637721" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jan 2025 23:40:16 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fG3QCjKSR5iFmwNA8sn1Rw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: GgeRfoaeRVy5SejxEYruNg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,294,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="103202463" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d63d4d77d921) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2025 23:40:14 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d63d4d77d921 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tV4CC-000ENL-2Y; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 07:40:12 +0000 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 15:39:31 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Charles Keepax , broonie@kernel.org Cc: Paul Gazzillo , Necip Fazil Yildiran , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8994: Add depends on MFD core Message-ID: <202501071530.UwIXs7OL-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250106154639.3999553-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250106154639.3999553-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Hi Charles, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on broonie-sound/for-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.13-rc6 next-20250106] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Charles-Keepax/ASoC-wm8994-Add-depends-on-MFD-core/20250106-235153 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250106154639.3999553-1-ckeepax%40opensource.cirrus.com patch subject: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8994: Add depends on MFD core config: alpha-kismet-CONFIG_SND_SOC_WM8994-CONFIG_SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_MIDAS_WM1811-0-0 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250107/202501071530.UwIXs7OL-lkp@intel.com/config) reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250107/202501071530.UwIXs7OL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501071530.UwIXs7OL-lkp@intel.com/ kismet warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> kismet: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_SOC_WM8994 when selected by SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_MIDAS_WM1811 WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_SOC_WM8994 Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && MFD_WM8994 [=n] Selected by [y]: - SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_MIDAS_WM1811 [=y] && SOUND [=y] && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && SND_SOC_SAMSUNG [=y] && IIO [=y] -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki