From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 507DE1AB50D for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 08:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736326299; cv=none; b=kBk1ZXqf4XQp73qGElHZyfzzXLjp36lXKNC+r1IcQ5wQKpOzIYh/GU6LB3pv7HKxEIjPRaun1n35Br+d+XilVmQduYVRuOFKA4m3pjCz1LN24DIwnneK22+fKHDgmcXRYl5PZahINVXvqwSeDvZv2ceRDlFbNjUEBsCJ/k613TM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736326299; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4gHb8LZcPbOsG6Eir5tpeamCn1mt6ZGCjs0GKyR/v2g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VHLlS7/cMruJCDT2C9gdjTR3qyDTjp6Jc+zRoLlXvWPmfk0T+TF3BD44khTGfGCd6TdmwQgZh4SveS3WPY2IwmC46mUZMQMj/vOxPlHewmPqIS+363u2Xr8q7/OmntkajU32q+h9nNDWnghpPdqyRgZvml/JrJUvhN9TaoAKJs0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=OwJla7I8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="OwJla7I8" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=kV+1aSsb1/lrlVM8ICxCvdGCBWerEiR8FrPkiImAlWQ=; b=OwJla7I8POCGEtFlPhExIXIMgX H/U9IQfsK7jqnZ+5oglEb6mqB6PHR5riHLChUShq0Z51GV5YH3/Vbq6COJD2HIy9Fwtot3TTimsff i5DbKKK+juaC6AstkKwL4NV60n8FJiPUSntD+euGWlUo57Tkshh4T3AxhkDXT8PW5yBGIq+FEWC58 qzWS8217n7e+jrAnHWQaxiRKdwyl00SuCxeIBF7qBIjfW2QMd4JXJjjdgsPm8U/fqnBmR5sDrbnYo NBtzk9ivBuHzt38krsQwDJf8tYTvimtNd7XiLk12uOAB7ostso2aH0xPnw5gVlc4Ci6u1VUXvPh2u RS/JEnQQ==; Received: from 77-249-17-89.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.89] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tVRmm-0000000EIBb-449z; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 08:51:33 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2FD33005D6; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:51:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:51:32 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Tejun Heo Cc: Changwoo Min , void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com, mingo@redhat.com, changwoo@igalia.com, kernel-dev@igalia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] sched_ext: Support high-performance monotonically non-decreasing clock Message-ID: <20250108085132.GD23315@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20241230095625.114363-1-changwoo@igalia.com> <20250107195347.GD28303@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 09:55:16AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 08:53:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > The patch series generally look good to me. Peter, if things look okay to > > > > you, I'll apply the series to sched_ext/for-6.14. > > > > > > Applying to sched_ext/for-6.14. Please holler if there are concerns. > > > > Urgh, I'll try and have a look, but have a hate for everybody who's been > > working through x-mas :/ > > Ah, I'm just back too. FWIW, the patchset is a lot simpler now, so hopefully > there shouldn't be too much to object to. I'll hold off until you can take a > look. Thanks! Code does appear simpler now. But I think there's an ordering issue, I've replied to the patch in question.