From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B6E620551F; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736525211; cv=none; b=tb19nPWJ55fFf2TYKLBeRwI+r0RcTPTH2bPG+yRN7IkhVprpILQqeOz4L9Znf0Fwqo8yiE2FzsbPfbUlLKMadKDdLFIGwiukrieE5CeMTKYx1LQtoN+ft20Sn1gQgHFk3QzmxLBem2UA20QIIye9N96KqZDDTtiPF0TtAhJjYvc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736525211; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X5uJ2d4Frw2p6RQLVQlpcIJMO5IqfY/W26Jd0yHvWN0=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OpeaU7gpcmLBnS2cjcdtmO8shXczaqqb59Ne5oYdIltmggThMrpKDrpghzXlVKrlk7AVgx4rvyeFiI8LA9gQJddKklhoAJQLFl95xtR8e7IBVOqutgZ4G2JBt80sJjMiSGr5gAJngULubx6yMj0W6EyjmbS8C78wdyw95MjR0Hk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4YV5y56j3Vz6JB35; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:02:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A28C140CF4; Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:06:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:06:46 +0100 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:06:45 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Update Event Records to CXL spec rev 3.1 Message-ID: <20250110160645.00007b74@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20250110115556.1654-1-shiju.jose@huawei.com> References: <20250110115556.1654-1-shiju.jose@huawei.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500011.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.215) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 11:55:50 +0000 wrote: > From: Shiju Jose > > Add updates in the CXL events records and CXL trace events implementations > for the changes in CXL spec rev 3.1. > > Shiju Jose (6): > cxl/events: Update Common Event Record to CXL spec rev 3.1 > cxl/events: Add Component Identifier formatting for CXL spec rev 3.1 > cxl/events: Update General Media Event Record to CXL spec rev 3.1 > cxl/events: Update DRAM Event Record to CXL spec rev 3.1 > cxl/events: Update Memory Module Event Record to CXL spec rev 3.1 > cxl/test: Update test code for event records to CXL spec rev 3.1 > > Changes: > V4 -> V5 > 1. Reverted changes made in v4 for overcoming parsing error when > libtraceevent in userspace parses the CXL trace events, for rasdaemon. > This was due to trace event's format file is larger than PAGE_SIZE, not > supported reading complete format file in one go in the kernel and thus > fixed in the rasdaemon. Great to see that resolved. > 2. Rebased to v6.13-rc5. Should probably say why when doing a rebase to something other than rc1. In this case this is what cxl.git/next is based on after some fixes earlier in the cycle so a sensible choice for this set. As far as I'm concerned this set is ready to go, but more eyes always good if anyone has time! Same for the ras-daemon series once this is queued for the kernel. Jonathan > 3. Tested with rasdaemon and ras-mc-ctl tools updated for CXL spec rev 3.1 > event record changes.