From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05D961FBE9B for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736879657; cv=none; b=mFx7ordwMYs322GAy+CgXlBGDp/B3YlsjO9dYMmvSmHfQSyOWidt900USCCQzwDgOYz0n2rm6s4AiTWBGZBdXk+j9wn8+QdftSaDlGRs4hsOWnUB63JrL6DpA5uJq1ziD8yDXDoKaR+jXOE32ODxPUH2WvkhbyteT5N7CZHn87U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736879657; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mr01IQU3yPNQBizG0iTYQGWw3rNWxN4dV5uwfxSBcJg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=o3QYpSAnKLZ7ML2IYFa+YnHypSnYbZeDUQJqdT/EvDaoezz2yB+wX8qqOTNjZ0A+EO9FUIcsmi5wLwFVoMOUBMPYRfXNcFfN9bZtaJffIqiCzKlO97+x3UNizoe1g5SDDQS8eIqBDwHL8jMVY6mY0UIHp5CJk4+i58NG5PrVerM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=WGRkV/MH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="WGRkV/MH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1736879655; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mr01IQU3yPNQBizG0iTYQGWw3rNWxN4dV5uwfxSBcJg=; b=WGRkV/MHUh4M4lqIApfed56ck5WzilJ3wp014pAV1mUlwm2kxWxEb5+tcrudE61m/f/ext U6HqeKQifFpYrOtl9DuNzHiqewYHaZ6/cCKKrszU+Hno0F0PG0FK3Dt5etjSk40Lr/Rftc l9mKDvdNQ/KkCwFQXuMe1stPufVM0Tw= Received: from mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-138-h3KCTtdpP-eXh0RrI1je-Q-1; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:34:11 -0500 X-MC-Unique: h3KCTtdpP-eXh0RrI1je-Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: h3KCTtdpP-eXh0RrI1je-Q Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CB521936D17; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.143]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F641955BE3; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:34:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez To: quic_yuzha@quicinc.com Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, jjohnson@kernel.org, kvalo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, quic_cjhuang@quicinc.com, jtornosm@redhat.com, vbenes@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: allow APs combination when dual stations are supported Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:34:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20250114183405.60530-1-jtornosm@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20241211174155.30782-1-jtornosm@redhat.com> References: <20241211174155.30782-1-jtornosm@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 How is this going? Could you tell me if your proposed interface combination (or any different solution) is going to go ahead? Thanks Best regards Jose Ignacio