From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF0691D5143 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736934410; cv=none; b=q3VRUGlgu0s0fEgSNOlg7RK/X5mAaDYfHPhRWuXr6+Ik3xvgxSntj6C3XlxobnLGY0GnWGXJ/fKWoQUHjSoAumXjAzkGIuZIW8j25Hp5EluRqdKCUHfTdUngld6wHKJBoCxrm17Z6caqdZPKJyIIVttiumlYscHmxlmm9zsiv4s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736934410; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RxUWxCt7rcX0HrQOs3U5ych9ofEKteYsHZaooyka2pc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=uYxeJ04n0RLWtGmLF36hcdhfKE1kmxUIG92hejiXWu4QqXfKMdD3NeMD77ZfcmLHbxrz02Vacg68bm30/FNw8Grr/X4+9bOIMxS/PrpE4US+bUH96qty6lZJzCmvS8cJsBOrZYzB1olM+gM0PDhuvgx3xRksSVddbOCuR99cl2A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=B7YuaJM3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="B7YuaJM3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1736934408; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RxUWxCt7rcX0HrQOs3U5ych9ofEKteYsHZaooyka2pc=; b=B7YuaJM3YM8meGS1uyyimFLK5DGiThPjmamBeNvecZkpIeR6bMU1iMfZtglugzyDAUhBAR BoChjtMnyJB8iD6r+Obz0hLavyq3DNeSFZfHKJfiGRCX6NzVGaD/ZwHlSrLjssz9jHLxyG WC4gyVUf6j+iVVLqifvda7SnsXR2RCs= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-62-A04rJFB3NHqB92hmB2wNAg-1; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 04:46:43 -0500 X-MC-Unique: A04rJFB3NHqB92hmB2wNAg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: A04rJFB3NHqB92hmB2wNAg Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08ABC1955D80; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.171]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567BF30001BE; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:46:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez To: quic_yuzha@quicinc.com Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, jjohnson@kernel.org, jtornosm@redhat.com, kvalo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, quic_cjhuang@quicinc.com, vbenes@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: allow APs combination when dual stations are supported Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:46:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20250115094636.132250-1-jtornosm@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <52a3efe8-c550-4494-af63-6b8c6894e7b5@quicinc.com> References: <52a3efe8-c550-4494-af63-6b8c6894e7b5@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 Hello Yuriy, We can debug/configure NetworkManager on our own to get what we need. Now, I am just trying to get a solution because at this moment 2APs can not be configured as before. As I commented, if you want to have a common interface combination, please go ahead with yours, and then we can see. Thanks Best regards Jose Ignacio