From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB7EE1E9916 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736939195; cv=none; b=BS+eHv03qFdc+tD5dFPkLTq9saX5hbCsYqUKii1E67vroXsq0N+jv8oKnHtDxLyqVPI0/tIUznF3a4ai+wR7XoExZ3OIiKGF/h8QCft9DPZHbhpxzb5P9RXzES4Yigmv3PpVLUd6oqRP4C9tn+2vo5JHrKL1fkIgc1xQ6m0uGP8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736939195; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hSuBcyrIiocPptm8Y5otPG1ERSmPfpYHXzYVlnWzqY8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=M20P8E84pWQyxq8H8QHQSsuLu3NpadONePP9Y70HUl6JOIMj2g6EkrtKY1l6/Z96b/ieDQviz7H2xJ1x5fySavG/k5UyFzCKDuqRGStNQ1nzbpucOUuzupSmhHSckYepgn+sfD9WuTrUePd+P17tMxk1DYFPFKNWkzjDnonhsTo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=DfUVpTue; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="DfUVpTue" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1736939192; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hSuBcyrIiocPptm8Y5otPG1ERSmPfpYHXzYVlnWzqY8=; b=DfUVpTueHwJdZWCGLAE1JJsLlJqkL2TEBVLEg8qwT/MvjnCZIzao/9SSsw8tHwBLqpY/uu zWBb+GPlSkvbvg2SrZxgncD1eA9cG9OJdoKa9TzVH5t26GZrmFMLF8tagULA57pOVZZ2T8 Yq3yI3O5+mupFgtfxUg+AB6YZZzZEvs= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-547-ODsRmIcUPXi4Zg68X6wMkg-1; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 06:06:29 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ODsRmIcUPXi4Zg68X6wMkg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: ODsRmIcUPXi4Zg68X6wMkg Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ACB01956055; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.171]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8769E19560AE; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:06:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez To: quic_yuzha@quicinc.com Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, jjohnson@kernel.org, jtornosm@redhat.com, kvalo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, quic_cjhuang@quicinc.com, vbenes@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: allow APs combination when dual stations are supported Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 12:06:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20250115110621.134716-1-jtornosm@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1090a0e4-6a19-422f-83ad-4566e5c86015@quicinc.com> References: <1090a0e4-6a19-422f-83ad-4566e5c86015@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Hello Yuriy, Buff ... again the same that was already in the thread ... As I commented, if you want to have a common interface combination, please go ahead with yours, and then we can see on our own. Thanks Best regards Jose Ignacio