From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD691241A14 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736942114; cv=none; b=psBXO4bvwCfywmQ/bNf4pLd7Wibf/6uhkQM8PsUmQyPuKQevva+zKORqEHUQzxDgHFQZOSJKyYmCrXt95QKe9fipNQXbLP9Jc63KvLbWFxp5loRLe9kUyIdlLcNGH1Fo7RMtVVog44pXp5GlljRTYYSZzSMo0Gk+RCXP3GQak6M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736942114; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5jdBVcuRYAYKm88V5FWgOWQsPFO7ecaB/oY1YierEEw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=pXaEma8YxuqamaFPNbkAiSsVRD5plJkX6KE9RwPDH67eetgDXCCbckbkP29iWll1tV9P3u5jci8goMs2C8gZEmnf/c2zXX9rzhq3W5rzSx33je6gbBkKQQdPr9imjCnhvME0gg7ztFsGiHuRdB0ngNJ7RpQZsb+fTVeJOanARJA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=SQsbH4i5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="SQsbH4i5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1736942110; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5WZ3HqHzhCeXbjJNpUFTds2GJZaGaXWIORjllCaEmy4=; b=SQsbH4i5V0hwIxH+0bMI7I0UyrwFIkabZKVeAoNHUwGK9lddXwh7w827Aw/o+KRmxXwBuG xgVr40+tct8q2t8jtnMVpuAVzyMItnuG9xaPCY6PO3OqgvQyiUfD7xU869gsV7fmYMJ9vm 6wglxB/mKuKizwLUTdpHslBMLpJoUU0= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-541-MVFhiMHMP4ecDAVoAD_tyg-1; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 06:55:07 -0500 X-MC-Unique: MVFhiMHMP4ecDAVoAD_tyg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: MVFhiMHMP4ecDAVoAD_tyg Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F0871955F67; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.171]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8CC19560A3; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:55:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez To: quic_yuzha@quicinc.com Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, jjohnson@kernel.org, jtornosm@redhat.com, kvalo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, quic_cjhuang@quicinc.com, vbenes@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: allow APs combination when dual stations are supported Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 12:55:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20250115115500.136864-1-jtornosm@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4ef22e4e-1ef8-4c16-ae01-06adf23415f8@quicinc.com> References: <4ef22e4e-1ef8-4c16-ae01-06adf23415f8@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Hello Yuriy, It is just a matter of the number of resoruces available. But before any further investigation/adjustment from us, I would like to confirm that your interface combination is what it is going to be used (I haven't seen it in ath/wireless/wireless-next/...). Are you going to proceed with that? Thanks Best regards Jose Ignacio