From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5712A2459BA for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736946251; cv=none; b=eIWrTmRvXlp8PVDoSLkdAyfLJpao6gGnweMvfPyriuEJXmr0LcUi7TieskyxyLRmAKcJq0MCvY72jDpHHGScoKfePs4qB2gU79Nokd8WnuGqUQyEnLv44PzCGJKw39DfHeuPPIWEQ9oWRyVCFH33SWhXLv6G5k7/2v15dJmfCQk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736946251; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BIPi0LYR4jbUUm2a/97wNZOq6LKVgEAqIZ8/607KDYQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=DrjZ3aI3vv5OuZ+ohWrLPk7XONGU1RENGg9vJz2N6/nzMxQnnWfDuIPNbk4IxLv/TCVoILesA3sXC4jynP+hPo6OGd511Ep9LcQMnYT6UXbxHOpD/JWPSZuxJivki33pT6dR9BgkK96lyH8xooGM99Or/FNA8ultxh6X3kmU2bY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=I6oaixEv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="I6oaixEv" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1736946249; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BIPi0LYR4jbUUm2a/97wNZOq6LKVgEAqIZ8/607KDYQ=; b=I6oaixEvRjahjyBdCwXDgUm16Uq+1oHBCM0XvuKN/T0ui9E0ZYGS8LWQsROzkJA2IZOA7H +cRWnM80CjsapPtP0JeS4kj1WvzZr7JKxz1ZAxrTfwMfgIH1m0XXyfdFfWGnum7XkYHqmV 8FMPA+XiV9FJlTfsLI5HyTJRTQdumfE= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-404-WqJCVVQ5PvuGuwyK2Q3izQ-1; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 08:04:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: WqJCVVQ5PvuGuwyK2Q3izQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: WqJCVVQ5PvuGuwyK2Q3izQ Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EE321978CA2; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:04:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.171]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C084919560A3; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:04:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez To: quic_yuzha@quicinc.com Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, jjohnson@kernel.org, jtornosm@redhat.com, kvalo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, quic_cjhuang@quicinc.com, vbenes@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: allow APs combination when dual stations are supported Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 14:03:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20250115130359.138890-1-jtornosm@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Hello Yuriy, Thank you for the information. My platform, as you said, is just wcn6855 hw2.1, but using NetworkManager with the default configuration. If this is the only stopper, you can skip and not consider as a wrong case, because (sorry for repeating) it is just a matter of the number of available resources that can be adjusted after some research from us. Thanks Best regards Jose Ignacio