public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
	dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 3/3] perf/x86/intel: Support PEBS counters snapshotting
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:42:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250116204225.GA7232@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be90e73b-eedf-4ff0-a832-b579e003cac9@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 10:55:46AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:

> > Also, I think I found you another bug... Consider what happens to the
> > counter value when we reschedule a HES_STOPPED counter, then we skip
> > x86_pmu_start(RELOAD) on step2, which leave the counter value with
> > 'random' crap from whatever was there last.
> > 
> > But meanwhile you do program PEBS to sample it. That will happily sample
> > this garbage.
> > 
> > Hmm?
> 
> I'm not quite sure I understand the issue.
> 
> The HES_STOPPED counter should be a pre-existing counter. Just for some
> reason, it's stopped, right? So perf doesn't need to re-configure the
> PEBS__DATA_CFG, since the idx is not changed.

Suppose you have your group {A, B, C} and lets suppose A is the PEBS
event, further suppose that B is also a sampling event. Lets say they
get hardware counters 1,2 and 3 respectively.

Then lets say B gets throttled.

While it is throttled, we get a new event D scheduled, and D gets placed
on counter 2 -- where B lives, which gets moved over to counter 4.

Then our loops will update and remove B from 2, but because
throttled/HES_STOPPED it will not start it on counter 4.

Meanwhile, we do have the PEBS_DATA_CFG thing updated to sample counter
1,3 and 4.

PEBS assist happens, and samples the uninitialized counter 4.

We unthrottle B and program counter 4.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-16 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-15 18:43 [PATCH V9 1/3] perf/x86/intel: Avoid pmu_disable/enable if !cpuc->enabled in sample read kan.liang
2025-01-15 18:43 ` [PATCH V9 2/3] perf: Avoid the read if the count is already updated kan.liang
2025-01-15 18:43 ` [PATCH V9 3/3] perf/x86/intel: Support PEBS counters snapshotting kan.liang
2025-01-16 11:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-16 15:55     ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-16 20:42       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-01-16 20:56         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-16 21:50           ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-21 15:25             ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-23  9:14             ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-23 15:36               ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-16 12:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-16 10:32 ` [PATCH V9 1/3] perf/x86/intel: Avoid pmu_disable/enable if !cpuc->enabled in sample read Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-16 10:51   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250116204225.GA7232@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox