From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"kevin.tian@intel.com" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhiw@nvidia.com>, Aniket Agashe <aniketa@nvidia.com>,
Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
"Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@nvidia.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Andy Currid <acurrid@nvidia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Dan Williams <danw@nvidia.com>,
"Anuj Aggarwal (SW-GPU)" <anuaggarwal@nvidia.com>,
Matt Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] vfio/nvgrace-gpu: Check the HBM training and C2C link status
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 20:22:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250119202252.4fcd2c49.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250119201232.04af85b2.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 20:12:32 -0700
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 02:24:14 +0000
> Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_memory_lock_and_enable);
> > >>
> > >> void vfio_pci_memory_unlock_and_restore(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, u16 cmd)
> > >> {
> > >> pci_write_config_word(vdev->pdev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
> > >> up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> > >> }
> > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_memory_unlock_and_restore);
> > >>
> > >> static unsigned long vma_to_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > >> {
> > >
> > > The access is happening before the device is exposed to the user, the
> > > above are for handling conditions while there may be races with user
> > > access, this is totally unnecessary.
> >
> > Right. What I could do to reuse the code is to take out the part
> > related to locking/unlocking as new functions and export that.
> > The current vfio_pci_memory_lock_and_enable() would take the lock
> > and call the new function. Same for vfio_pci_memory_unlock_and_restore().
> > The nvgrace module could also call that new function. Does that sound
> > reasonable?
>
> No, this is standard PCI driver stuff, everything you need is already
> there. Probably pci_enable_device() and some variant of
> pci_request_regions().
>
> > > Does this delay even need to happen in the probe function, or could it
> > > happen in the open_device callback? That would still be before user
> > > access, but if we expect it to generally work, it would allow the
> > > training to happen in the background up until the user tries to open
> > > the device. Thanks,
> > >
> > > Alex
> >
> > The thought process is that since it is purely bare metal coming to proper
> > state while boot, the nvgrace module should probably wait for the startup
> > to complete during probe() instead of delaying until open() time.
>
> If the driver is statically loaded, that might mean you're willing to
> stall boot for up to 30s. In practice is this ever actually going to
> fail? Thanks,
On second thought, I guess a vfio-pci variant driver can't
automatically bind to a device, whether statically built or not, so
maybe this isn't a concern. I'm not sure if there are other concerns
with busy waiting for up to 30s at driver probe. Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-20 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 23:37 [PATCH v4 0/3] vfio/nvgrace-gpu: Enable grace blackwell boards ankita
2025-01-17 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] vfio/nvgrace-gpu: Read dvsec register to determine need for uncached resmem ankita
2025-01-20 7:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-01-20 17:01 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-01-21 1:20 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-01-17 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] vfio/nvgrace-gpu: Expose the blackwell device PF BAR1 to the VM ankita
2025-01-20 7:29 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-01-20 17:13 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-01-17 23:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] vfio/nvgrace-gpu: Check the HBM training and C2C link status ankita
2025-01-18 1:52 ` Alex Williamson
2025-01-20 2:24 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-01-20 3:12 ` Alex Williamson
2025-01-20 3:22 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2025-01-20 3:35 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-01-20 7:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-01-20 13:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250119202252.4fcd2c49.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=anuaggarwal@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox