public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
	dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V10 2/4] perf/x86/intel: Avoid disable PMU if !cpuc->enabled in sample read
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 07:23:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250121152303.3128733-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250121152303.3128733-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

The WARN_ON(this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.enabled)) in the
intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload() is triggered, when sampling read
topdown events.

In a NMI handler, the cpu_hw_events.enabled is set and used to indicate
the status of core PMU. The generic pmu->pmu_disable_count, updated in
the perf_pmu_disable/enable pair, is not touched.
However, the perf_pmu_disable/enable pair is invoked when sampling read
in a NMI handler. The cpuc->enabled is mistakenly set by the
perf_pmu_enable().

Avoid disabling PMU if the core PMU is already disabled.
Merge the logic together.

Fixes: 7b2c05a15d29 ("perf/x86/intel: Generic support for hardware TopDown metrics")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---

Changes since V9:
- Merge the read_event related codes together

 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c   | 11 +---------
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 4daa45ae9bd2..762b140c4953 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -2775,28 +2775,33 @@ static u64 icl_update_topdown_event(struct perf_event *event)
 
 DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event, x86_perf_event_update);
 
-static void intel_pmu_read_topdown_event(struct perf_event *event)
+static void intel_pmu_read_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+	if (event->hw.flags & (PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD | PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN)) {
+		struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+		bool pmu_enabled = cpuc->enabled;
 
-	/* Only need to call update_topdown_event() once for group read. */
-	if ((cpuc->txn_flags & PERF_PMU_TXN_READ) &&
-	    !is_slots_event(event))
-		return;
+		/* Only need to call update_topdown_event() once for group read. */
+		if (is_metric_event(event) && (cpuc->txn_flags & PERF_PMU_TXN_READ))
+			return;
 
-	perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu);
-	static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(event);
-	perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
-}
+		cpuc->enabled = 0;
+		if (pmu_enabled)
+			intel_pmu_disable_all();
 
-static void intel_pmu_read_event(struct perf_event *event)
-{
-	if (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD)
-		intel_pmu_auto_reload_read(event);
-	else if (is_topdown_count(event))
-		intel_pmu_read_topdown_event(event);
-	else
-		x86_perf_event_update(event);
+		if (is_topdown_event(event))
+			static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(event);
+		else
+			intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer();
+
+		cpuc->enabled = pmu_enabled;
+		if (pmu_enabled)
+			intel_pmu_enable_all(0);
+
+		return;
+	}
+
+	x86_perf_event_update(event);
 }
 
 static void intel_pmu_enable_fixed(struct perf_event *event)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index 322963b02a91..eb14b46423e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -953,7 +953,7 @@ int intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer(void)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static inline void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer(void)
+void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer(void)
 {
 	struct perf_sample_data data;
 
@@ -2094,15 +2094,6 @@ get_next_pebs_record_by_bit(void *base, void *top, int bit)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-void intel_pmu_auto_reload_read(struct perf_event *event)
-{
-	WARN_ON(!(event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD));
-
-	perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu);
-	intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer();
-	perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
-}
-
 /*
  * Special variant of intel_pmu_save_and_restart() for auto-reload.
  */
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 084e9196b458..536a112f6353 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -1644,7 +1644,7 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_disable_all(void);
 
 void intel_pmu_pebs_sched_task(struct perf_event_pmu_context *pmu_ctx, bool sched_in);
 
-void intel_pmu_auto_reload_read(struct perf_event *event);
+void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer(void);
 
 void intel_pmu_store_pebs_lbrs(struct lbr_entry *lbr);
 
-- 
2.38.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-21 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-21 15:23 [PATCH V10 1/4] perf/x86/intel: Apply static call for drain_pebs kan.liang
2025-01-21 15:23 ` kan.liang [this message]
2025-02-03 12:48   ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Avoid disable PMU if !cpuc->enabled in sample read tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-02-05  9:38   ` tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-01-21 15:23 ` [PATCH V10 3/4] perf: Avoid the read if the count is already updated kan.liang
2025-02-03 12:48   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
2025-02-05  9:38   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
2025-01-21 15:23 ` [PATCH V10 4/4] perf/x86/intel: Support PEBS counters snapshotting kan.liang
2025-01-27 15:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-27 16:15     ` Liang, Kan
2025-02-04 21:09     ` Liang, Kan
2025-02-03 12:48   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-02-05  9:38   ` tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-02-03 12:48 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Apply static call for drain_pebs tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
2025-02-05  9:38 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra (Intel)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250121152303.3128733-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox