From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A70B1442F6 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 04:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=96.67.55.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737606501; cv=none; b=VL3oBy31bSJz+uqylGXVPpA5oVHE28579xPu2gg1VJvyEkh2H1AhyvCjBVH9S0Vy57+AQpifbPYivpIGd9uPUMxjtMrgUeXpqiuzDU9tHRLHOz7TR8QXd3fSjeOxnvSDHqzmDyAncfSqV+4Vt9ZKg/p23Ik+O5bxQutde8GbUSQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737606501; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rTGBicN6ZKa8rZqw9TTP4VUUkL0Cjfe5D7TGkIrNyws=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=FXpaVXSl2cVF2pvZSCz/466siyXPjz0Wg76wtO3yS24/CIc2sYuQnx77getZOSsT3n9qu7miKAHrNS11aWffCtqyvhCgvdB8QSNJvZzYQtkrfViVk395EqtO16Vdmyy2sNK7SHB6ytbRfPPE9LzhjEk4trMqzjcsjNcIfQOQthQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=surriel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=shelob.surriel.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=96.67.55.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=surriel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=shelob.surriel.com Received: from fangorn.home.surriel.com ([10.0.13.7]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1taols-000000005uH-2fkG; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 23:24:48 -0500 From: Rik van Riel To: x86@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, nadav.amit@gmail.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com, mhklinux@outlook.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, Rik van Riel , Dave Hansen Subject: [PATCH v7 03/12] x86/mm: consolidate full flush threshold decision Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 23:23:22 -0500 Message-ID: <20250123042447.2259648-4-riel@surriel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.1 In-Reply-To: <20250123042447.2259648-1-riel@surriel.com> References: <20250123042447.2259648-1-riel@surriel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: riel@surriel.com Reduce code duplication by consolidating the decision point for whether to do individual invalidations or a full flush inside get_flush_tlb_info. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel Suggested-by: Dave Hansen --- arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c index 6cf881a942bb..4c2feb7259b1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c @@ -1009,6 +1009,15 @@ static struct flush_tlb_info *get_flush_tlb_info(struct mm_struct *mm, info->initiating_cpu = smp_processor_id(); info->trim_cpumask = 0; + /* + * If the number of flushes is so large that a full flush + * would be faster, do a full flush. + */ + if ((end - start) >> stride_shift > tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling) { + info->start = 0; + info->end = TLB_FLUSH_ALL; + } + return info; } @@ -1026,17 +1035,8 @@ void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, bool freed_tables) { struct flush_tlb_info *info; + int cpu = get_cpu(); u64 new_tlb_gen; - int cpu; - - cpu = get_cpu(); - - /* Should we flush just the requested range? */ - if ((end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL) || - ((end - start) >> stride_shift) > tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling) { - start = 0; - end = TLB_FLUSH_ALL; - } /* This is also a barrier that synchronizes with switch_mm(). */ new_tlb_gen = inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm); @@ -1089,22 +1089,19 @@ static void do_kernel_range_flush(void *info) void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) { - /* Balance as user space task's flush, a bit conservative */ - if (end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL || - (end - start) > tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling << PAGE_SHIFT) { - on_each_cpu(do_flush_tlb_all, NULL, 1); - } else { - struct flush_tlb_info *info; + struct flush_tlb_info *info; - preempt_disable(); - info = get_flush_tlb_info(NULL, start, end, 0, false, - TLB_GENERATION_INVALID); + guard(preempt)(); + info = get_flush_tlb_info(NULL, start, end, PAGE_SHIFT, false, + TLB_GENERATION_INVALID); + + if (info->end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL) + on_each_cpu(do_flush_tlb_all, NULL, 1); + else on_each_cpu(do_kernel_range_flush, info, 1); - put_flush_tlb_info(); - preempt_enable(); - } + put_flush_tlb_info(); } /* @@ -1276,7 +1273,7 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch) int cpu = get_cpu(); - info = get_flush_tlb_info(NULL, 0, TLB_FLUSH_ALL, 0, false, + info = get_flush_tlb_info(NULL, 0, TLB_FLUSH_ALL, PAGE_SHIFT, false, TLB_GENERATION_INVALID); /* * flush_tlb_multi() is not optimized for the common case in which only -- 2.47.1