From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Cheung Wall <zzqq0103.hey@gmail.com>,
Neeraj upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] rcu: Use _full() API to debug synchronize_rcu()
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 19:58:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250123185828.460836-4-urezki@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250123185828.460836-1-urezki@gmail.com>
Switch for using of get_state_synchronize_rcu_full() and
poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full() pair for debug a normal
synchronize_rcu() call.
Just using "not" full APIs to identify if a grace period
is passed or not might lead to a false kernel splat.
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h | 4 ++++
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 +++-----
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h b/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h
index f9bed3d3f78d..a16fc2a9a7d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h
@@ -16,6 +16,10 @@
struct rcu_synchronize {
struct rcu_head head;
struct completion completion;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
+ /* This is for testing. */
+ struct rcu_gp_oldstate oldstate;
+#endif
};
void wakeme_after_rcu(struct rcu_head *head);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 2795d6b5109c..0ae90089ef09 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1612,12 +1612,10 @@ static void rcu_sr_normal_complete(struct llist_node *node)
{
struct rcu_synchronize *rs = container_of(
(struct rcu_head *) node, struct rcu_synchronize, head);
- unsigned long oldstate = (unsigned long) rs->head.func;
WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) &&
- !poll_state_synchronize_rcu(oldstate),
- "A full grace period is not passed yet: %lu",
- rcu_seq_diff(get_state_synchronize_rcu(), oldstate));
+ !poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full(&rs->oldstate),
+ "A full grace period is not passed yet!\n");
/* Finally. */
complete(&rs->completion);
@@ -3214,7 +3212,7 @@ static void synchronize_rcu_normal(void)
* snapshot before adding a request.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU))
- rs.head.func = (void *) get_state_synchronize_rcu();
+ get_state_synchronize_rcu_full(&rs.oldstate);
rcu_sr_normal_add_req(&rs);
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-23 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-23 18:58 [PATCH 1/4] rcutorture: Allow a negative value for nfakewriters Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-01-23 18:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] torture: Remove CONFIG_NR_CPUS configuration Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-01-23 20:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-24 11:41 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-24 15:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-24 17:21 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-24 17:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-24 17:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-24 19:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-27 13:27 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-27 14:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-27 15:42 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-27 16:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-27 17:26 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-27 18:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-27 18:31 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-27 19:24 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-27 20:37 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-28 0:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-28 12:17 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-28 12:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-28 14:34 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-28 18:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-28 20:57 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-23 18:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] rcu: Update TREE05.boot to test normal synchronize_rcu() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-01-23 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-23 18:58 ` Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) [this message]
2025-01-23 21:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] rcu: Use _full() API to debug synchronize_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-24 11:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-24 15:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-28 20:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] rcutorture: Allow a negative value for nfakewriters Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-28 21:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250123185828.460836-4-urezki@gmail.com \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zzqq0103.hey@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox