From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] perf/x86/intel: Fix ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 07:48:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250129154820.3755948-3-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250129154820.3755948-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The EAX of the CPUID Leaf 023H enumerates the mask of valid sub-leaves.
To tell the availability of the sub-leaf 1 (enumerate the counter mask),
perf should check the bit 1 (0x2) of EAS, rather than bit 0 (0x1).
The error is not user-visible on bare metal. Because the sub-leaf 0 and
the sub-leaf 1 are always available. However, it may bring issues in a
virtualization environment when a VMM only enumerates the sub-leaf 0.
Introduce the cpuid35_e?x to replace the macros, which makes the
implementation style consistent.
Fixes: eb467aaac21e ("perf/x86/intel: Support Architectural PerfMon Extension leaf")
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 0a1030eb6db8..120df9620951 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -4945,20 +4945,22 @@ static inline bool intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap(void)
static void update_pmu_cap(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
{
- unsigned int sub_bitmaps, eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+ unsigned int cntr, fixed_cntr, ecx, edx;
+ union cpuid35_eax eax;
+ union cpuid35_ebx ebx;
- cpuid(ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF, &sub_bitmaps, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+ cpuid(ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF, &eax.full, &ebx.full, &ecx, &edx);
- if (ebx & ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_UMASK2)
+ if (ebx.split.umask2)
pmu->config_mask |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK2;
- if (ebx & ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_EQ)
+ if (ebx.split.eq)
pmu->config_mask |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EQ;
- if (sub_bitmaps & ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF_BIT) {
+ if (eax.split.cntr_subleaf) {
cpuid_count(ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF, ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF,
- &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
- pmu->cntr_mask64 = eax;
- pmu->fixed_cntr_mask64 = ebx;
+ &cntr, &fixed_cntr, &ecx, &edx);
+ pmu->cntr_mask64 = cntr;
+ pmu->fixed_cntr_mask64 = fixed_cntr;
}
if (!intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap()) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index adaeb8ca3a8a..9aef5d044706 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -194,11 +194,33 @@ union cpuid10_edx {
* detection/enumeration details:
*/
#define ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_LEAF 0x00000023
-#define ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_UMASK2 0x1
-#define ARCH_PERFMON_EXT_EQ 0x2
-#define ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF_BIT 0x1
#define ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF 0x1
+union cpuid35_eax {
+ struct {
+ unsigned int leaf0:1;
+ /* Counters Sub-Leaf */
+ unsigned int cntr_subleaf:1;
+ /* Auto Counter Reload Sub-Leaf */
+ unsigned int acr_subleaf:1;
+ /* Events Sub-Leaf */
+ unsigned int events_subleaf:1;
+ unsigned int reserved:28;
+ } split;
+ unsigned int full;
+};
+
+union cpuid35_ebx {
+ struct {
+ /* UnitMask2 Supported */
+ unsigned int umask2:1;
+ /* EQ-bit Supported */
+ unsigned int eq:1;
+ unsigned int reserved:30;
+ } split;
+ unsigned int full;
+};
+
/*
* Intel Architectural LBR CPUID detection/enumeration details:
*/
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-29 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-29 15:48 [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup for Intel PMU initialization kan.liang
2025-01-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid kan.liang
2025-02-11 15:06 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-01-29 15:48 ` kan.liang [this message]
2025-02-11 15:06 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel: Fix ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2025-01-29 15:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/intel: Clean up counter information update and check kan.liang
2025-02-03 13:16 ` [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup for Intel PMU initialization Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-03 16:14 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250129154820.3755948-3-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox