Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 5/6] net: devmem: Implement TX path

Simon Horman
2025-01-31T09:09:35Z

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 09:15:38PM +0000, Mina Almasry wrote:
> Augment dmabuf binding to be able to handle TX. Additional to all the RX
> binding, we also create tx_vec needed for the TX path.
>
> Provide API for sendmsg to be able to send dmabufs bound to this device:
>
> - Provide a new dmabuf_tx_cmsg which includes the dmabuf to send from.
> - MSG_ZEROCOPY with SCM_DEVMEM_DMABUF cmsg indicates send from dma-buf.
>
> Devmem is uncopyable, so piggyback off the existing MSG_ZEROCOPY
> implementation, while disabling instances where MSG_ZEROCOPY falls back
> to copying.
>
> We additionally pipe the binding down to the new
> zerocopy_fill_skb_from_devmem which fills a TX skb with net_iov netmems
> instead of the traditional page netmems.
>
> We also special case skb_frag_dma_map to return the dma-address of these
> dmabuf net_iovs instead of attempting to map pages.
>
> Based on work by Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>. A lot of the meat
> of the implementation came from devmem TCP RFC v1[1], which included the
> TX path, but Stan did all the rebasing on top of netmem/net_iov.
>
> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
> Signed-off-by: Kaiyuan Zhang <kaiyuanz@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>

...

> diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c

> index 0e41699df419..9ba6994e2a05 100644
> --- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> +++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c

...

> @@ -911,10 +912,68 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> return err;
> }
>
> -/* stub */
> int netdev_nl_bind_tx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> {
> - return 0;
> + struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding;
> + struct list_head *sock_binding_list;
> + struct net_device *netdev;
> + u32 ifindex, dmabuf_fd;
> + struct sk_buff *rsp;
> + int err = 0;
> + void *hdr;
> +
> + if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_DEV_IFINDEX) ||
> + GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_DMABUF_FD))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ifindex = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_DEV_IFINDEX]);
> + dmabuf_fd = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_DMABUF_FD]);
> +
> + sock_binding_list =
> + genl_sk_priv_get(&netdev_nl_family, NETLINK_CB(skb).sk);
> + if (IS_ERR(sock_binding_list))
> + return PTR_ERR(sock_binding_list);
> +
> + rsp = genlmsg_new(GENLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rsp)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + hdr = genlmsg_iput(rsp, info);
> + if (!hdr) {
> + err = -EMSGSIZE;
> + goto err_genlmsg_free;
> + }
> +
> + rtnl_lock();
> +
> + netdev = __dev_get_by_index(genl_info_net(info), ifindex);
> + if (!netdev || !netif_device_present(netdev)) {
> + err = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + binding = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(netdev, DMA_TO_DEVICE, dmabuf_fd,
> + info->extack);
> + if (IS_ERR(binding)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(binding);
> + goto err_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + list_add(&binding->list, sock_binding_list);
> +
> + nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_DMABUF_ID, binding->id);
> + genlmsg_end(rsp, hdr);
> +
> + rtnl_unlock();
> +
> + return genlmsg_reply(rsp, info);
> +
> + net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf(binding);

Hi Mina,

It appears that the line above is unreachable.
I guess it was part of an unwind that is no-longer needed
and thus can now be removed.

Flagged by Smatch.

> +err_unlock:
> + rtnl_unlock();
> +err_genlmsg_free:
> + nlmsg_free(rsp);
> + return err;
> }

...