From: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@gmail.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@gmail.com>,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched: Fixes typos in comments
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 21:02:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250202153200.72444-1-atulpant.linux@gmail.com> (raw)
Fixes spelling errors in the comments.
Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@gmail.com>
---
changes since v1:
added changelog
removed an incorrect fix
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/wait_bit.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 3e5a6bf58..451e30249 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -8998,7 +8998,7 @@ void sched_release_group(struct task_group *tg)
* that tg_unthrottle_up() won't add decayed cfs_rq's to it.
*
* We therefore defer calling unregister_fair_sched_group() to
- * sched_unregister_group() which is guarantied to get called only after the
+ * sched_unregister_group() which is guaranteed to get called only after the
* current RCU grace period has expired.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&task_group_lock, flags);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 0bed0fa1a..f8ada8239 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime *curr, struct prev_cputime *prev,
stime = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(stime, rtime, stime + utime);
/*
* Because mul_u64_u64_div_u64() can approximate on some
- * achitectures; enforce the constraint that: a*b/(b+c) <= a.
+ * architectures; enforce the constraint that: a*b/(b+c) <= a.
*/
if (unlikely(stime > rtime))
stime = rtime;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait_bit.c b/kernel/sched/wait_bit.c
index b410b61ce..4197f5ed2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/wait_bit.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/wait_bit.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_wait_var_entry);
* given variable to change. wait_var_event() can be waiting for an
* arbitrary condition to be true and associates that condition with an
* address. Calling wake_up_var() suggests that the condition has been
- * made true, but does not strictly require the condtion to use the
+ * made true, but does not strictly require the condition to use the
* address given.
*
* The wake-up is sent to tasks in a waitqueue selected by hash from a
--
2.34.1
reply other threads:[~2025-02-02 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250202153200.72444-1-atulpant.linux@gmail.com \
--to=atulpant.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox