From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 280D92063DB for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 20:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738699555; cv=none; b=HHYg4IE6GO9Nv7A+VlfFk4BBgsmOtXvuqIFRSJHjRrkHJXQBEntOF9iqzG5RSDgFV1zkxX3Cn0BBBZZbENLXurZZ0+uJJflq7klI/eskEJR+f2z6qhJ+btoMKLq1DdzE2QDhP6jmYOc+dsKM/fMnoZJG4yF8O6HjS/Moc3VKN2c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738699555; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9fZkcDDwevQQmaDKNtrtcxMATnvflU/CtBXDvwOi2rw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VGPVxkvzBzJ956OM6J11AzY4jLGaISM/AgL252lliTLbEICZNCFf43jyduOXU2bLB0KhRjkMgRpS31oxKjRT59kRF5AelJ7oEsG+do7G/U02/deztTVYyXj1hSxGgMSAfmHVa70vZ77lNNQtIaHPZa6So6UhhF7lBDZSOiRlr/s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PtYyiKdV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PtYyiKdV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96D6EC4CEDF; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 20:05:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738699554; bh=9fZkcDDwevQQmaDKNtrtcxMATnvflU/CtBXDvwOi2rw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PtYyiKdVoSH6SX+5ztqA8WNcC0J7Gd2rQzIcilSJQtjoA8Jrk4lu4xZQsJJVilWWB erlERTSeydRV3HLqVML2Yo0WValXY0bQbdGEEIReRtH+bd0E6UZJRbsoTgcwCoCLoV gcVYUtM1gDYIbLKPkoz3tg/xsk6/BKFuGNvkHpC2tZ0067auwpxM52EbMBcGfHUBI6 gPfPPsDUUNunkk6+ar49cBd6t+ZkRUHigiQkH+7XKaCvd0hEMrv6tmkTp6qY+Vlv5B vRYMuQZfB0oWPWRQgszFwp3nTj4mN8GHcRGKd+HYkJFWyZfbASn1HJyxpC9i3Rm/Rp a+nESaEUoLczQ== Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 12:05:51 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Rong Xu Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Yabin Cui , Will Deacon , Han Shen , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Sami Tolvanen , Alice Ryhl , "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" , Samuel Holland , "Paul E. McKenney" , Arnd Bergmann , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Propeller: Remove the architecture specific config Message-ID: <202502041205.AC52C57C0C@keescook> References: <20241211222945.1325793-1-xur@google.com> <20241211222945.1325793-2-xur@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241211222945.1325793-2-xur@google.com> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 02:29:43PM -0800, Rong Xu wrote: > The CONFIG_PROPELLER_CLANG option currently depends on > ARCH_SUPPORTS_PROPELLER_CLANG, but this dependency seems unnecessary. > > Remove ARCH_SUPPORTS_PROPELLER_CLANG and allow users to control > Propeller builds solely through CONFIG_PROPELLER_CLANG. This simplifies > the kconfig and avoids potential confusion. > > Signed-off-by: Rong Xu With Nathan's question answered, this looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Kees Cook -- Kees Cook