From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5205F207679; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738680278; cv=none; b=GIgIapq98lGUUaIzE6XLuszh2UAQdwsHjVWdFoYmiClZ98s4ecJopuqxt56nhgnVL1euRR7qG3RCPb7OD/gVaz5yHfb+9KnCcfHXMRs5Z9giDqZDOcgTv/AvVvenPmHMnB884df2b6YSXP+kP142inbC8VVNP0VzOrwF1D3tllA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738680278; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9qpNVsut/c6M5WoPl9GAwPNWB0VL3neUMFBcrqESpEQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GCnvV5xZiNCgfvfwA6VbbiVd1U4Q+76yfv8eaoSOy1zAxTZgG4aGlx6bUW9QCffnrL03zyb/Ecwr2QVWfIqt5lvBrDp6+p36uSyQ2LfXCTpNmx0lCN55uG02qpqh7HvATPWE9pSfGA7IODGqSVl3JWRi24G55MGltcG+3FtjxRE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YXlffpRU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YXlffpRU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28AD6C4CEDF; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:44:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738680278; bh=9qpNVsut/c6M5WoPl9GAwPNWB0VL3neUMFBcrqESpEQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YXlffpRUlIOfhrljsycxJmuQsSSP8zT+Eg5L+gMONdPkxtw7Ov7CVOiU7NRJXegyF OmuD6XOaAEdTShp8GPyAB7k+5TKaCOprhD15gWv/DsYZudP75l/ilhJ2FcH9Wm1ic0 P17REi19l3dpLpNvwO0xB/Bz3/C/vmq42T/LO1jYzKnKHeFkKleRXPI97lqMkKThrj esUrF7yn+FRv+0Pum3Lh43lyP7CHe/8ql9NawSUMEbwu9ZbfXesuz3pNIS80TD4Txq G0LgWZTygXYmSwDI3pRlI8So3V0paYevz3ISztLJdDJ8zlpYxgFKZEX0i+PJ2YFXnF WZ22U8rWlR0Ow== Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:44:32 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Peter Seiderer Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Shuah Khan , Nam Cao , Thomas Gleixner , Frederic Weisbecker , Artem Chernyshev Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 05/10] net: pktgen: fix 'ratep 0' error handling (return -EINVAL) Message-ID: <20250204144432.GI234677@kernel.org> References: <20250203170201.1661703-1-ps.report@gmx.net> <20250203170201.1661703-6-ps.report@gmx.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250203170201.1661703-6-ps.report@gmx.net> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 06:01:56PM +0100, Peter Seiderer wrote: > Given an invalid 'ratep' command e.g. 'ratep 0' the return value is '1', > leading to the following misleading output: > > - the good case > > $ echo "ratep 100" > /proc/net/pktgen/lo\@0 > $ grep "Result:" /proc/net/pktgen/lo\@0 > Result: OK: ratep=100 > > - the bad case (before the patch) > > $ echo "ratep 0" > /proc/net/pktgen/lo\@0" > -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument > $ grep "Result:" /proc/net/pktgen/lo\@0 > Result: No such parameter "atep" > > - with patch applied > > $ echo "ratep 0" > /proc/net/pktgen/lo\@0 > -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument > $ grep "Result:" /proc/net/pktgen/lo\@0 > Result: Idle > > Signed-off-by: Peter Seiderer Reviewed-by: Simon Horman