public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT
	AND 64-BIT)),
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING
	FRAMEWORK), Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Use _free macro to free put policy
Date: Thu,  6 Feb 2025 15:56:51 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206215659.3350066-7-superm1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206215659.3350066-1-superm1@kernel.org>

From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>

Using a scoped cleanup macro simplifies cleanup code.

Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
index d9ab98c6f56b1..adaa62fb2b04e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
 
 #include <acpi/cppc_acpi.h>
 
@@ -127,10 +128,11 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
 	u32 highest_perf = 0, nominal_perf = 0, lowest_nonlinear_perf = 0, lowest_perf = 0;
 	u64 cap1 = 0;
 	struct cppc_perf_caps cppc_perf;
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
 	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = NULL;
+
 		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 		if (!policy)
 			break;
@@ -141,7 +143,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
 			if (ret) {
 				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
 				pr_err("%s cppc_get_perf_caps ret=%d error!\n", __func__, ret);
-				goto skip_test;
+				return;
 			}
 
 			highest_perf = cppc_perf.highest_perf;
@@ -153,7 +155,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
 			if (ret) {
 				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
 				pr_err("%s read CPPC_CAP1 ret=%d error!\n", __func__, ret);
-				goto skip_test;
+				return;
 			}
 
 			highest_perf = AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1);
@@ -166,7 +168,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
 		    !cpudata->hw_prefcore) {
 			pr_err("%s cpu%d highest=%d %d highest perf doesn't match\n",
 				__func__, cpu, highest_perf, cpudata->perf.highest_perf);
-			goto skip_test;
+			return;
 		}
 		if ((nominal_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->perf.nominal_perf)) ||
 			(lowest_nonlinear_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf)) ||
@@ -176,7 +178,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
 				__func__, cpu, nominal_perf, cpudata->perf.nominal_perf,
 				lowest_nonlinear_perf, cpudata->perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf,
 				lowest_perf, cpudata->perf.lowest_perf);
-			goto skip_test;
+			return;
 		}
 
 		if (!((highest_perf >= nominal_perf) &&
@@ -187,15 +189,11 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
 			pr_err("%s cpu%d highest=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > lowest=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
 				__func__, cpu, highest_perf, nominal_perf,
 				lowest_nonlinear_perf, lowest_perf);
-			goto skip_test;
+			return;
 		}
-		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 	}
 
 	amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
-	return;
-skip_test:
-	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -206,10 +204,11 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
 static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
 {
 	int cpu = 0;
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
 	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = NULL;
+
 		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 		if (!policy)
 			break;
@@ -223,14 +222,14 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
 			pr_err("%s cpu%d max=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > min=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
 				__func__, cpu, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq, cpudata->nominal_freq,
 				cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq);
-			goto skip_test;
+			return;
 		}
 
 		if (cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq != policy->min) {
 			amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
 			pr_err("%s cpu%d cpudata_lowest_nonlinear_freq=%d policy_min=%d, they should be equal!\n",
 				__func__, cpu, cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, policy->min);
-			goto skip_test;
+			return;
 		}
 
 		if (cpudata->boost_supported) {
@@ -242,20 +241,16 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
 				pr_err("%s cpu%d policy_max=%d should be equal cpu_max=%d or cpu_nominal=%d !\n",
 					__func__, cpu, policy->max, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq,
 					cpudata->nominal_freq);
-				goto skip_test;
+				return;
 			}
 		} else {
 			amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
 			pr_err("%s cpu%d must support boost!\n", __func__, cpu);
-			goto skip_test;
+			return;
 		}
-		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 	}
 
 	amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
-	return;
-skip_test:
-	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 }
 
 static int amd_pstate_set_mode(enum amd_pstate_mode mode)
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-06 21:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-06 21:56 [PATCH 00/14] amd-pstate cleanups Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 01/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Show a warning when a CPU fails to setup Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 11:59   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-10 13:50     ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-10 15:13       ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 02/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop min and max cached frequencies Mario Limonciello
2025-02-07 10:44   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-07 16:15     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 03/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move perf values into a union Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 13:38   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 22:14     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12  6:31       ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-12 22:03         ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 04/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Overhaul locking Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11  5:02   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 21:54     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12  5:15       ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-12 22:05         ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 05/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop `cppc_cap1_cached` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11  5:46   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-02-11  5:58   ` [PATCH 06/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Use _free macro to free put policy Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11  6:16   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 18:31     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 08/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache CPPC request in shared mem case too Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11  9:18   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 09/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move all EPP tracing into *_update_perf and *_set_epp functions Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12  6:39   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 10/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Update cppc_req_cached for shared mem EPP writes Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:01   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 11/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop debug statements for policy setting Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:03   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 12/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache a pointer to policy in cpudata Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:13   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 19:17     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12  3:52       ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 13/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Rework CPPC enabling Mario Limonciello
2025-02-13  4:42   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 14/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Stop caching EPP Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:27   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250206215659.3350066-7-superm1@kernel.org \
    --to=superm1@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox