From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, thomas.falcon@intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf tool_pmu: Add skip check in tool_pmu__event_to_str()
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 07:28:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250207152844.302167-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Some topdown related metrics may fail on hybrid machines.
$perf stat -M tma_frontend_bound
Cannot resolve IDs for tma_frontend_bound:
cpu_atom@TOPDOWN_FE_BOUND.ALL@ / (8 * cpu_atom@CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE@)
In the find_tool_events(), the tool_pmu__event_to_str() is used to
compare the tool_events. It only checks the event name, no PMU or arch.
So the tool_events[TOOL_PMU__EVENT_SLOTS] is set to true, because the
p-core Topdown metrics has "slots" event.
The tool_events is shared. So when parsing the e-core metrics, the
"slots" is automatically added.
The "slots" event as a tool event should only be available on arm64. It
has a different meaning on X86. The tool_pmu__skip_event() intends
handle the case. Apply it for tool_pmu__event_to_str() as well.
There is a lack of sanity check in the expr__get_id(). Add the check.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/608077bc-4139-4a97-8dc4-7997177d95c4@linux.intel.com/
Fixes: 069057239a67 ("perf tool_pmu: Move expr literals to tool_pmu")
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/util/expr.c | 2 ++
tools/perf/util/tool_pmu.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.c b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
index c221dcce6666..6413537442aa 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/expr.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
@@ -215,6 +215,8 @@ int expr__add_ref(struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx, struct metric_ref *ref)
int expr__get_id(struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx, const char *id,
struct expr_id_data **data)
{
+ if (!ctx || !id)
+ return -1;
return hashmap__find(ctx->ids, id, data) ? 0 : -1;
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/tool_pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/tool_pmu.c
index 4fb097578479..3a68debe7143 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/tool_pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/tool_pmu.c
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ int tool_pmu__num_skip_events(void)
const char *tool_pmu__event_to_str(enum tool_pmu_event ev)
{
- if (ev > TOOL_PMU__EVENT_NONE && ev < TOOL_PMU__EVENT_MAX)
+ if ((ev > TOOL_PMU__EVENT_NONE && ev < TOOL_PMU__EVENT_MAX) &&
+ !tool_pmu__skip_event(tool_pmu__event_names[ev]))
return tool_pmu__event_names[ev];
return NULL;
--
2.38.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 15:28 kan.liang [this message]
2025-02-07 16:52 ` [PATCH] perf tool_pmu: Add skip check in tool_pmu__event_to_str() Ian Rogers
2025-02-12 1:39 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250207152844.302167-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox