From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
charlie@rivosinc.com, jesse@rivosinc.com,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] riscv: Annotate unaligned access init functions
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:19:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250207161939.46139-12-ajones@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207161939.46139-11-ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Several functions used in unaligned access probing are only run at
init time. Annotate them appropriately.
Fixes: f413aae96cda ("riscv: Set unaligned access speed at compile time")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 4 ++--
arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 8 ++++----
arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 14 +++++++-------
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 569140d6e639..19defdc2002d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void __init riscv_user_isa_enable(void);
#define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET_VALIDATE(_name, _id, _sub_exts, _validate) \
_RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, _sub_exts, ARRAY_SIZE(_sub_exts), _validate)
-bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void);
+bool __init check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void);
#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED)
void check_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_unused);
void unaligned_emulation_finish(void);
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static inline bool unaligned_ctl_available(void)
}
#endif
-bool check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void);
+bool __init check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void);
#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_VECTOR_MISALIGNED)
void check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_unused);
DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, vector_misaligned_access);
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
index 7cc108aed74e..aacbd9d7196e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ void check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_un
kernel_vector_end();
}
-bool check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
+bool __init check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
{
int cpu;
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ bool check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
return true;
}
#else
-bool check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
+bool __init check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
{
return false;
}
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void check_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_unused)
}
}
-bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
+bool __init check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
{
int cpu;
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ bool unaligned_ctl_available(void)
return unaligned_ctl;
}
#else
-bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
+bool __init check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
{
return false;
}
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
index 91f189cf1611..b7a8ff7ba6df 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int check_unaligned_access(void *param)
return 0;
}
-static void check_unaligned_access_nonboot_cpu(void *param)
+static void __init check_unaligned_access_nonboot_cpu(void *param)
{
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct page **pages = param;
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static void set_unaligned_access_static_branches(void)
modify_unaligned_access_branches(&fast_and_online, num_online_cpus());
}
-static int lock_and_set_unaligned_access_static_branch(void)
+static int __init lock_and_set_unaligned_access_static_branch(void)
{
cpus_read_lock();
set_unaligned_access_static_branches();
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int riscv_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
}
/* Measure unaligned access speed on all CPUs present at boot in parallel. */
-static int check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
+static int __init check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
{
unsigned int cpu;
unsigned int cpu_count = num_possible_cpus();
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static int check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
return 0;
}
#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */
-static int check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
+static int __init check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int riscv_online_cpu_vec(unsigned int cpu)
}
/* Measure unaligned access speed on all CPUs present at boot in parallel. */
-static int vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void *unused __always_unused)
+static int __init vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void *unused __always_unused)
{
schedule_on_each_cpu(check_vector_unaligned_access);
@@ -393,13 +393,13 @@ static int vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void *unused __always_unuse
return 0;
}
#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */
-static int vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void *unused __always_unused)
+static int __init vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void *unused __always_unused)
{
return 0;
}
#endif
-static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
+static int __init check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
{
bool all_cpus_emulated, all_cpus_vec_unsupported;
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 16:19 [PATCH 0/9] riscv: Unaligned access speed probing fixes and skipping Andrew Jones
2025-02-07 16:19 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2025-02-13 12:59 ` [PATCH 1/9] riscv: Annotate unaligned access init functions Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-07 16:19 ` [PATCH 2/9] riscv: Fix riscv_online_cpu_vec Andrew Jones
2025-02-07 16:47 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-07 17:08 ` Andrew Jones
2025-02-07 17:43 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-07 18:08 ` Andrew Jones
2025-02-13 13:02 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-07 16:19 ` [PATCH 3/9] riscv: Fix check_unaligned_access_all_cpus Andrew Jones
2025-02-13 13:12 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-07 16:19 ` [PATCH 4/9] riscv: Change check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus to void Andrew Jones
2025-02-07 16:42 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-13 13:15 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-07 16:19 ` [PATCH 5/9] riscv: Fix set up of cpu hotplug callbacks Andrew Jones
2025-02-07 16:44 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-13 13:25 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-13 13:33 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-07 16:19 ` [PATCH 6/9] riscv: Fix set up of vector cpu hotplug callback Andrew Jones
2025-02-07 17:36 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-07 18:15 ` Andrew Jones
2025-02-13 13:28 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-07 16:19 ` [PATCH 7/9] riscv: Prepare for unaligned access type table lookups Andrew Jones
2025-02-08 1:22 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-02-10 9:43 ` Andrew Jones
2025-02-10 17:10 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-02-10 10:16 ` Anup Patel
2025-02-10 11:07 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-10 14:06 ` Andrew Jones
2025-02-10 14:20 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-10 17:20 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-02-10 20:42 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-10 20:53 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-02-10 20:57 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-10 21:13 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-02-11 4:26 ` Anup Patel
2025-02-11 8:37 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-11 18:09 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2025-02-10 17:19 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-02-10 20:37 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-11 9:04 ` Andrew Jones
2025-02-07 16:19 ` [PATCH 8/9] riscv: Implement check_unaligned_access_table Andrew Jones
2025-02-07 16:19 ` [PATCH 9/9] riscv: Add Ventana unaligned access table entries Andrew Jones
2025-02-08 7:59 ` [PATCH 0/9] riscv: Unaligned access speed probing fixes and skipping Anup Patel
2025-02-10 9:26 ` Andrew Jones
2025-02-10 9:58 ` Anup Patel
2025-02-10 11:01 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250207161939.46139-12-ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=jesse@rivosinc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox