The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: zihan zhou <15645113830zzh@gmail.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, bsegall@google.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] sched: Reduce the default slice to avoid tasks getting an extra tick
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 09:04:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202502080831.VwRnAlxo-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207062402.33725-1-15645113830zzh@gmail.com>

Hi zihan,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core]
[also build test ERROR on peterz-queue/sched/core linus/master v6.14-rc1 next-20250207]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/zihan-zhou/sched-Reduce-the-default-slice-to-avoid-tasks-getting-an-extra-tick/20250207-142556
base:   tip/sched/core
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250207062402.33725-1-15645113830zzh%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] sched: Reduce the default slice to avoid tasks getting an extra tick
config: i386-randconfig-141-20250208 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250208/202502080831.VwRnAlxo-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250208/202502080831.VwRnAlxo-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502080831.VwRnAlxo-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from kernel/sched/build_utility.c:72:
>> kernel/sched/debug.c:193:2: error: call to undeclared function 'sched_update_scaling'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     193 |         sched_update_scaling();
         |         ^
   1 error generated.


vim +/sched_update_scaling +193 kernel/sched/debug.c

   168	
   169	
   170	static ssize_t sched_base_slice_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
   171					   size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos)
   172	{
   173		char buf[16];
   174		unsigned int base_slice;
   175	
   176		if (cnt > 15)
   177			cnt = 15;
   178	
   179		if (copy_from_user(&buf, ubuf, cnt))
   180			return -EFAULT;
   181		buf[cnt] = '\0';
   182	
   183		if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &base_slice))
   184			return -EINVAL;
   185	
   186	
   187		base_slice = clamp_t(u64, base_slice,
   188						NSEC_PER_MSEC/10,   /* HZ=1000 * 10 */
   189						NSEC_PER_MSEC*100); /* HZ=100  / 10 */
   190	
   191		sysctl_sched_base_slice = base_slice;
   192	
 > 193		sched_update_scaling();
   194	
   195		*ppos += cnt;
   196		return cnt;
   197	}
   198	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-08  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-07  6:09 [PATCH V2 0/2] sched: Reduce the default slice to avoid tasks getting an extra tick zihan zhou
2025-02-07  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] " zihan zhou
2025-02-07 13:46   ` Vincent Guittot
2025-02-08  8:51     ` zihan zhou
2025-02-07  6:24 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] " zihan zhou
2025-02-08  1:04   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-02-08  5:59   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202502080831.VwRnAlxo-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=15645113830zzh@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox