From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@intel.com>,
Tatyana Nikolova <tatyana.e.nikolova@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/irdma: switch to using the crc32c library
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:00:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250210180005.GE1264@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250209154416.GA1230@sol.localdomain>
On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 07:44:18AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 11:12:55AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 07:57:50PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 07:36:43PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > > +int irdma_ieq_check_mpacrc(const void *addr, u32 len, u32 val)
> > > > {
> > > > - u32 crc = 0;
> > > > -
> > > > - crypto_shash_digest(desc, addr, len, (u8 *)&crc);
> > > > - if (crc != val)
> > > > + if (~crc32c(~0, addr, len) != val)
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > Sorry, I just realized this isn't actually equivalent on big endian CPUs, since
> > > the byte array produced by crypto_shash_digest() used little endian byte order,
> > > whereas crc32c() just returns a CPU endian value.
> > >
> > > And of course this broken subsystem uses u32 for the little endian values
> > > instead of __le32 like the result of the kernel.
> > >
> > > Not sure it's worth my time to continue to try to fix this subsystem properly.
> >
> > There is no need to be such dramatic. You are not fixing anything by
> > switch to new APIs
>
> Exactly. That's because I dropped the patches that actually did fix real
> endianness bugs, because of the pointless pushback I received -- see
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20250127223840.67280-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/T/#u
Anyway, I already sent v3 of this patch that keeps the cpu_to_le32() to maintain
the exact same behavior as the old code, so please consider that if you are
interested. Note that I had to add '(__force u32)' to be compatible with this
driver's incorrect types, but that was effectively already there before, just
hidden by writing bytes into a u32.
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 3:36 [PATCH v2] RDMA/irdma: switch to using the crc32c library Eric Biggers
2025-02-07 3:57 ` Eric Biggers
2025-02-09 9:12 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-09 15:44 ` Eric Biggers
2025-02-10 18:00 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250210180005.GE1264@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mustafa.ismail@intel.com \
--cc=tatyana.e.nikolova@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox