From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
asml.silence@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 06/19] futex: Pass in task to futex_queue()
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:30:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250211013047.4096767-6-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211013047.4096767-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
[ Upstream commit 5e0e02f0d7e52cfc8b1adfc778dd02181d8b47b4 ]
futex_queue() -> __futex_queue() uses 'current' as the task to store in
the struct futex_q->task field. This is fine for synchronous usage of
the futex infrastructure, but it's not always correct when used by
io_uring where the task doing the initial futex_queue() might not be
available later on. This doesn't lead to any issues currently, as the
io_uring side doesn't support PI futexes, but it does leave a
potentially dangling pointer which is never a good idea.
Have futex_queue() take a task_struct argument, and have the regular
callers pass in 'current' for that. Meanwhile io_uring can just pass in
NULL, as the task should never be used off that path. In theory
req->tctx->task could be used here, but there's no point populating it
with a task field that will never be used anyway.
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/22484a23-542c-4003-b721-400688a0d055@kernel.dk
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
io_uring/futex.c | 2 +-
kernel/futex/core.c | 5 +++--
kernel/futex/futex.h | 11 ++++++++---
kernel/futex/pi.c | 2 +-
kernel/futex/waitwake.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/futex.c b/io_uring/futex.c
index 914848f46beb2..01f044f89f8fa 100644
--- a/io_uring/futex.c
+++ b/io_uring/futex.c
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ int io_futex_wait(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
hlist_add_head(&req->hash_node, &ctx->futex_list);
io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
- futex_queue(&ifd->q, hb);
+ futex_queue(&ifd->q, hb, NULL);
return IOU_ISSUE_SKIP_COMPLETE;
}
diff --git a/kernel/futex/core.c b/kernel/futex/core.c
index 136768ae26375..010607a991949 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/core.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/core.c
@@ -554,7 +554,8 @@ void futex_q_unlock(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb);
}
-void __futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+void __futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
int prio;
@@ -570,7 +571,7 @@ void __futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
plist_node_init(&q->list, prio);
plist_add(&q->list, &hb->chain);
- q->task = current;
+ q->task = task;
}
/**
diff --git a/kernel/futex/futex.h b/kernel/futex/futex.h
index 8b195d06f4e8e..12e47386232ed 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/futex.h
+++ b/kernel/futex/futex.h
@@ -230,13 +230,15 @@ extern int futex_get_value_locked(u32 *dest, u32 __user *from);
extern struct futex_q *futex_top_waiter(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, union futex_key *key);
extern void __futex_unqueue(struct futex_q *q);
-extern void __futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb);
+extern void __futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
+ struct task_struct *task);
extern int futex_unqueue(struct futex_q *q);
/**
* futex_queue() - Enqueue the futex_q on the futex_hash_bucket
* @q: The futex_q to enqueue
* @hb: The destination hash bucket
+ * @task: Task queueing this futex
*
* The hb->lock must be held by the caller, and is released here. A call to
* futex_queue() is typically paired with exactly one call to futex_unqueue(). The
@@ -244,11 +246,14 @@ extern int futex_unqueue(struct futex_q *q);
* or nothing if the unqueue is done as part of the wake process and the unqueue
* state is implicit in the state of woken task (see futex_wait_requeue_pi() for
* an example).
+ *
+ * Note that @task may be NULL, for async usage of futexes.
*/
-static inline void futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+static inline void futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
+ struct task_struct *task)
__releases(&hb->lock)
{
- __futex_queue(q, hb);
+ __futex_queue(q, hb, task);
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
}
diff --git a/kernel/futex/pi.c b/kernel/futex/pi.c
index 5722467f27379..8ec12f1aff83b 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/pi.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/pi.c
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int tryl
/*
* Only actually queue now that the atomic ops are done:
*/
- __futex_queue(&q, hb);
+ __futex_queue(&q, hb, current);
if (trylock) {
ret = rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
diff --git a/kernel/futex/waitwake.c b/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
index 3a10375d95218..a9056acb75eef 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ void futex_wait_queue(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, struct futex_q *q,
* access to the hash list and forcing another memory barrier.
*/
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_FREEZABLE);
- futex_queue(q, hb);
+ futex_queue(q, hb, current);
/* Arm the timer */
if (timeout)
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ int futex_wait_multiple_setup(struct futex_vector *vs, int count, int *woken)
* next futex. Queue each futex at this moment so hb can
* be unlocked.
*/
- futex_queue(q, hb);
+ futex_queue(q, hb, current);
continue;
}
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 1:30 [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 01/19] nvme-fc: go straight to connecting state when initializing Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 02/19] nvme-fc: do not ignore connectivity loss during connecting Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 03/19] hrtimers: Mark is_migration_base() with __always_inline Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 04/19] powercap: call put_device() on an error path in powercap_register_control_type() Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 05/19] btrfs: avoid starting new transaction when cleaning qgroup during subvolume drop Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 07/19] iscsi_ibft: Fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning in ibft_attr_show_nic() Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 08/19] sched/debug: Provide slice length for fair tasks Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 09/19] platform/x86/intel: pmc: fix ltr decode in pmc_core_ltr_show() Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 10/19] drm/amd/display: Fix out-of-bound accesses Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 11/19] scsi: core: Use GFP_NOIO to avoid circular locking dependency Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 12/19] scsi: ufs: core: Fix error return with query response Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 13/19] scsi: qla1280: Fix kernel oops when debug level > 2 Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 14/19] Revert "drm/amd/display: Use HW lock mgr for PSR1" Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 15/19] ACPI: resource: IRQ override for Eluktronics MECH-17 Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 16/19] smb: client: fix noisy when tree connecting to DFS interlink targets Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 17/19] alpha/elf: Fix misc/setarch test of util-linux by removing 32bit support Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 18/19] vboxsf: fix building with GCC 15 Sasha Levin
2025-02-11 1:30 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 19/19] selftests: always check mask returned by statmount(2) Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250211013047.4096767-6-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox