From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5DA91F3D3F; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739268585; cv=none; b=hvFKdKcY8oT82tjSr6e4A2F+5Y80Awbqeon6nKet4zfEdkRnDqu2UWW6SE4DA4A6W+fLy4EhqxOSM3M7WKpOw9teqpCPAPnJQjKV9N7j+NdIpqe4svG+D7Di3pDK6UumwTjgDwc/RtfC+uYbOXVRbU0dd1KBuuaqnBCXdCfUjeU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739268585; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AyKoHq0oQHey+mDAeqZEs1jQgF36tuQkfMMGb89L/ZA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=By3eDq2mobmQe66FcShhTWE76FnzsGLAmQzI/SZkpIXYs/aXjqETjLuO3J8kpenKbCSLDN65oHJBvFn+5gOuGFplsXSt3o2QvpM02DzHALVMcgpVNbs8LHbjU9DqLtWZIB5KlRkVhL6z3tO2FZCAnMHAM+NF1fJWWl/z2ev/eHc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=VwJ75D5G; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="VwJ75D5G" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=nffVxaAp4SdZQua8XTyH64wt94TC+p4kCdzyytTJXoA=; b=VwJ75D5GAyqtpLn7DTGcRveayh /2NiQ/2kpMcOUCLDPrL0KCuAMEYQys4hxXqvLFx50UQKe7/1kzYOvxVTo+yzLN09dDn1PtD8q5zkC zHWQle6RsSh9TygrbrAinJcvv3sRebjAEVJ2E7iTH/eH7T3dSFzkJl405zOUr6TUCyUBRQqLk41Iw OJz9kOHauxf0Q0QRoiHT6FUWYObZopo8Po0ofk1ceXkZMMVwoKgNSUN4J0BQmKQhyv+ZOSsHAbkpn 31CyZ3sd+rqlSih6+i5dSmsCI90WGq3a1Oa3SPsjuGvTC0MPTyZsPXOdq46MRGZBewH1y85iTgyeJ tGkkY6Ww==; Received: from 77-249-17-252.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.252] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1thnCe-00000000vYW-0wjz; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:09:16 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E3D3D30063F; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:09:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:09:14 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" , Gabriel de Perthuis , Haiyue Wang , Sami Tolvanen , Mark Rutland , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: x86: Fix a compile error about get_kernel_nofault() Message-ID: <20250211100914.GA29593@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <173881156244.211648.1242168038709680511.stgit@devnote2> <20250206081225.GI7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20250206205449.5f83a585945ae6eb0cc15483@kernel.org> <20250206121328.GN7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20250206123307.GO7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20250207085959.b3e9d922eab33edf885368e3@kernel.org> <20250210173016.0ce79bc8@gandalf.local.home> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250210173016.0ce79bc8@gandalf.local.home> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 05:30:16PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:59:59 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > > Ah, this looks good to me except for the removing redundant asm/ibt.h > > which Haiyue pointed. > > > > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) > > Cool, so Peter's going to fix this and I can drop the fixes that are in > patchwork? I was aiming my patch for x86/core, but if there's a reason to expedite them, I can stick it in x86/urgent I suppose. Just need a reason -- what's this compile error nonsense about, my kernels build just fine?