From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Jan Vejvalka <jan.vejvalka@lfmotol.cuni.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:04:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250211120432.29493-2-jgross@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211120432.29493-1-jgross@suse.com>
When mapping a buffer for DMA via .map_page or .map_sg DMA operations,
there is no need to check the machine frames to be aligned according
to the mapped areas size. All what is needed in these cases is that the
buffer is contiguous at machine level.
So carve out the alignment check from range_straddles_page_boundary()
and move it to a helper called by xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() and
xen_swiotlb_free_coherent() directly.
Fixes: 9f40ec84a797 ("xen/swiotlb: add alignment check for dma buffers")
Reported-by: Jan Vejvalka <jan.vejvalka@lfmotol.cuni.cz>
Tested-by: Jan Vejvalka <jan.vejvalka@lfmotol.cuni.cz>
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
index a337edcf8faf..26c62e0d34e9 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
@@ -74,19 +74,21 @@ static inline phys_addr_t xen_dma_to_phys(struct device *dev,
return xen_bus_to_phys(dev, dma_to_phys(dev, dma_addr));
}
+static inline bool range_requires_alignment(phys_addr_t p, size_t size)
+{
+ phys_addr_t algn = 1ULL << (get_order(size) + PAGE_SHIFT);
+ phys_addr_t bus_addr = pfn_to_bfn(XEN_PFN_DOWN(p)) << XEN_PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ return IS_ALIGNED(p, algn) && !IS_ALIGNED(bus_addr, algn);
+}
+
static inline int range_straddles_page_boundary(phys_addr_t p, size_t size)
{
unsigned long next_bfn, xen_pfn = XEN_PFN_DOWN(p);
unsigned int i, nr_pages = XEN_PFN_UP(xen_offset_in_page(p) + size);
- phys_addr_t algn = 1ULL << (get_order(size) + PAGE_SHIFT);
next_bfn = pfn_to_bfn(xen_pfn);
- /* If buffer is physically aligned, ensure DMA alignment. */
- if (IS_ALIGNED(p, algn) &&
- !IS_ALIGNED((phys_addr_t)next_bfn << XEN_PAGE_SHIFT, algn))
- return 1;
-
for (i = 1; i < nr_pages; i++)
if (pfn_to_bfn(++xen_pfn) != ++next_bfn)
return 1;
@@ -156,7 +158,8 @@ xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
*dma_handle = xen_phys_to_dma(dev, phys);
if (*dma_handle + size - 1 > dma_mask ||
- range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size)) {
+ range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size) ||
+ range_requires_alignment(phys, size)) {
if (xen_create_contiguous_region(phys, order, fls64(dma_mask),
dma_handle) != 0)
goto out_free_pages;
@@ -182,7 +185,8 @@ xen_swiotlb_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *vaddr,
size = ALIGN(size, XEN_PAGE_SIZE);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dma_handle + size - 1 > dev->coherent_dma_mask) ||
- WARN_ON_ONCE(range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size)))
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size) ||
+ range_requires_alignment(phys, size)))
return;
if (TestClearPageXenRemapped(virt_to_page(vaddr)))
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 12:04 [PATCH 0/2] xen/swiotlb: one fix and one optimization Juergen Gross
2025-02-11 12:04 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2025-02-12 1:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements Stefano Stabellini
2025-02-12 6:53 ` Jan Beulich
2025-02-12 11:04 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-02-11 12:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen/swiotlb: don't destroy contiguous region in all cases Juergen Gross
2025-02-12 1:30 ` Stefano Stabellini
2025-02-12 11:15 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-02-12 21:14 ` Stefano Stabellini
2025-02-12 7:38 ` Jan Beulich
2025-02-12 11:11 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-02-12 11:49 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250211120432.29493-2-jgross@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jan.vejvalka@lfmotol.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox