public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] iommufd: Allocate attach_handle for any HWPT
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:21:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250211182137.GM3754072@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1738645017.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 09:00:53PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> An attach_handle is a hwpt->fault specific thing, so the fault.c has been
> holding a set of attach/detach/replace helpers for attach_handle and iopf
> enabling/disabling.
> 
> Now, both the iommufd_msi series [1] and the attach_pasid series [2] want
> to reuse the attach_handle for non-fault cases. Rework the attach_handle,
> to prepare for either of the series. It should be merged with either that
> gets merged first.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/cover.1736550979.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20241219132746.16193-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> 
> Patches in this series are from [1] with some fixes addressing the review
> comments.

Applied, the other patches can rebase on top of this

Thanks,
Jason

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-11 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-04  5:00 [PATCH v1 0/2] iommufd: Allocate attach_handle for any HWPT Nicolin Chen
2025-02-04  5:00 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] iommufd: Make attach_handle generic than fault specific Nicolin Chen
2025-02-11  6:47   ` Yi Liu
2025-02-11 18:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-04  5:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] iommufd/fault: Remove iommufd_fault_domain_attach/detach/replace_dev() Nicolin Chen
2025-02-11  6:54   ` Yi Liu
2025-02-11 18:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250211182137.GM3754072@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox