Re: [PATCH v7 12/17] cxl/pci: Add error handler for CXL PCIe Port RAS errors

Bowman, Terry
2025-02-12T16:34:51Z

On 2/11/2025 6:11 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
>
> On 2/11/25 12:24 PM, Terry Bowman wrote:
>> Introduce correctable and uncorrectable (UCE) CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error
>> handlers.
>>
>> The handlers will be called with a 'struct pci_dev' parameter
>> indicating the CXL Port device requiring handling. The CXL PCIe Port
>> device's underlying 'struct device' will match the port device in the
>> CXL topology.
>>
>> Use the PCIe Port's device object to find the matching CXL Upstream Switch
>> Port, CXL Downstream Switch Port, or CXL Root Port in the CXL topology. The
>> matching CXL Port device should contain a cached reference to the RAS
>> register block. The cached RAS block will be used in handling the error.
>>
>> Invoke the existing __cxl_handle_ras() or __cxl_handle_cor_ras() using
>> a reference to the RAS registers as a parameter. These functions will use
>> the RAS register reference to indicate an error and clear the device's RAS
>> status.
>>
>> Update __cxl_handle_ras() to return PCI_ERS_RESULT_PANIC in the case
>> an error is present in the RAS status. Otherwise, return
>> PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE.
> Maybe a comment on why the change?

Ok.
>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>> index af809e7cbe3b..3f13d9dfb610 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>> @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static void header_log_copy(void __iomem *ras_base, u32 *log)
>> * Log the state of the RAS status registers and prepare them to log the
>> * next error status. Return 1 if reset needed.
>> */
>> -static bool __cxl_handle_ras(struct device *dev, void __iomem *ras_base)
>> +static pci_ers_result_t __cxl_handle_ras(struct device *dev, void __iomem *ras_base)
>> {
>> u32 hl[CXL_HEADERLOG_SIZE_U32];
>> void __iomem *addr;
>> @@ -708,13 +708,13 @@ static bool __cxl_handle_ras(struct device *dev, void __iomem *ras_base)
>>
>> if (!ras_base) {
>> dev_warn_once(dev, "CXL RAS register block is not mapped");
>> - return false;
>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>> }
>>
>> addr = ras_base + CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_STATUS_OFFSET;
>> status = readl(addr);
>> if (!(status & CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK))
>> - return false;
>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>>
>> /* If multiple errors, log header points to first error from ctrl reg */
>> if (hweight32(status) > 1) {
>> @@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static bool __cxl_handle_ras(struct device *dev, void __iomem *ras_base)
>>
>> writel(status & CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
>>
>> - return true;
>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_PANIC;
>> }
>>
>> static bool cxl_handle_endpoint_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
>> @@ -782,6 +782,79 @@ static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>> writel(aer_cmd, aer_base + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND);
>> }
>>
>> +static int match_uport(struct device *dev, const void *data)
>> +{
>> + const struct device *uport_dev = data;
>> + struct cxl_port *port;
>> +
>> + if (!is_cxl_port(dev))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + port = to_cxl_port(dev);
>> +
>> + return port->uport_dev == uport_dev;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __iomem *cxl_pci_port_ras(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct device **dev)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *ras_base;
>> +
>> + if (!pdev || !*dev) {
>> + pr_err("Failed, parameter is NULL");
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) ||
>> + (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM)) {
> Can probably just do a switch block here for the type?
>
>> + struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port);
>> + struct cxl_dport *dport = NULL;
>> +
>> + port = find_cxl_port(&pdev->dev, &dport);
> Just declare port inline:
>
> struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
> find_cxl_port(&pdev->dev, &dport);
>
>> + if (!port) {
>> + pci_err(pdev, "Failed to find root/dport in CXL topology\n");
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ras_base = dport ? dport->regs.ras : NULL;
>> + *dev = &port->dev;
>> + } else if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
>> + struct device *port_dev __free(put_device);
> same comment here as above
>
> DJ

Thanks Dave, I'll incorporate these changes into v8.

Terry

>> + struct cxl_port *port;
>> +
>> + port_dev = bus_find_device(&cxl_bus_type, NULL, &pdev->dev,
>> + match_uport);
>> + if (!port_dev || !is_cxl_port(port_dev)) {
>> + pci_err(pdev, "Failed to find uport in CXL topology\n");
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + port = to_cxl_port(port_dev);
>> + ras_base = port ? port->uport_regs.ras : NULL;
>> + *dev = port_dev;
>> + } else {
>> + pci_err(pdev, "Unsupported device type\n");
>> + ras_base = NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ras_base;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void cxl_port_cor_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + void __iomem *ras_base = cxl_pci_port_ras(pdev, &dev);
>> +
>> + __cxl_handle_cor_ras(dev, ras_base);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static pci_ers_result_t cxl_port_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + void __iomem *ras_base = cxl_pci_port_ras(pdev, &dev);
>> +
>> + return __cxl_handle_ras(dev, ras_base);
>> +}
>> +
>> void cxl_uport_init_ras_reporting(struct cxl_port *port)
>> {
>>