From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT
AND 64-BIT)),
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING
FRAMEWORK), Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Allow lowest nonlinear and lowest to be the same
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 18:52:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250215005244.1212285-8-superm1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250215005244.1212285-1-superm1@kernel.org>
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Several Ryzen AI processors support the exact same value for lowest
nonlinear perf and lowest perf. Loosen up the unit tests to allow this
scenario.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
v2:
* New patch
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
index 9f790c7254d52..0f0b867e271cc 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
if (!((highest_perf >= nominal_perf) &&
(nominal_perf > lowest_nonlinear_perf) &&
- (lowest_nonlinear_perf > lowest_perf) &&
+ (lowest_nonlinear_perf >= lowest_perf) &&
(lowest_perf > 0))) {
amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
pr_err("%s cpu%d highest=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > lowest=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
if (!((policy->cpuinfo.max_freq >= cpudata->nominal_freq) &&
(cpudata->nominal_freq > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
- (cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq > policy->cpuinfo.min_freq) &&
+ (cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq >= policy->cpuinfo.min_freq) &&
(policy->cpuinfo.min_freq > 0))) {
amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
pr_err("%s cpu%d max=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > min=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-15 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-15 0:52 [PATCH v2 00/17] amd-pstate cleanups Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Show a warning when a CPU fails to setup Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 5:53 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop min and max cached frequencies Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 6:38 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-17 21:06 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move perf values into a union Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 9:01 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Overhaul locking Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 9:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop `cppc_cap1_cached` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 9:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Use _free macro to free put policy Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 10:11 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-02-17 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Allow lowest nonlinear and lowest to be the same Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Drop SUCCESS and FAIL enums Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 11:34 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Continue on missing policies Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 11:38 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-17 17:04 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Adjust variable scope for amd_pstate_ut_check_freq() Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 11:39 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 13:48 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-17 17:12 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache CPPC request in shared mem case too Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 13:54 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move all EPP tracing into *_update_perf and *_set_epp functions Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 14:14 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Update cppc_req_cached for shared mem EPP writes Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 14:30 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop debug statements for policy setting Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 14:31 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Rework CPPC enabling Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15 0:52 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Stop caching EPP Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250215005244.1212285-8-superm1@kernel.org \
--to=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox