public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>,
	"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>,
	"(open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 01:12:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202502180139.g2a2yoPe-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250215005244.1212285-12-superm1@kernel.org>

Hi Mario,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on amd-pstate/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on amd-pstate/bleeding-edge]
[cannot apply to rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge tip/x86/core linus/master v6.14-rc3 next-20250217]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mario-Limonciello/cpufreq-amd-pstate-Show-a-warning-when-a-CPU-fails-to-setup/20250215-085903
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/superm1/linux.git linux-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250215005244.1212285-12-superm1%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v2 11/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks
config: i386-randconfig-063-20250216 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250218/202502180139.g2a2yoPe-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250218/202502180139.g2a2yoPe-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502180139.g2a2yoPe-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c:145:19: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_GET'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     145 |                         highest_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_MASK, cap1);
         |                                        ^
   1 error generated.


vim +/FIELD_GET +145 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c

   105	
   106	/*
   107	 * check if performance values are reasonable.
   108	 * highest_perf >= nominal_perf > lowest_nonlinear_perf > lowest_perf > 0
   109	 */
   110	static int amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
   111	{
   112		int cpu = 0, ret = 0;
   113		u32 highest_perf = 0, nominal_perf = 0, lowest_nonlinear_perf = 0, lowest_perf = 0;
   114		u64 cap1 = 0;
   115		struct cppc_perf_caps cppc_perf;
   116		struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
   117		union perf_cached cur_perf;
   118	
   119		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
   120			struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = NULL;
   121	
   122			policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
   123			if (!policy)
   124				continue;
   125			cpudata = policy->driver_data;
   126	
   127			if (get_shared_mem()) {
   128				ret = cppc_get_perf_caps(cpu, &cppc_perf);
   129				if (ret) {
   130					pr_err("%s cppc_get_perf_caps ret=%d error!\n", __func__, ret);
   131					return ret;
   132				}
   133	
   134				highest_perf = cppc_perf.highest_perf;
   135				nominal_perf = cppc_perf.nominal_perf;
   136				lowest_nonlinear_perf = cppc_perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf;
   137				lowest_perf = cppc_perf.lowest_perf;
   138			} else {
   139				ret = rdmsrl_safe_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD_CPPC_CAP1, &cap1);
   140				if (ret) {
   141					pr_err("%s read CPPC_CAP1 ret=%d error!\n", __func__, ret);
   142					return ret;
   143				}
   144	
 > 145				highest_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_MASK, cap1);
   146				nominal_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF_MASK, cap1);
   147				lowest_nonlinear_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF_MASK, cap1);
   148				lowest_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF_MASK, cap1);
   149			}
   150	
   151			cur_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->perf);
   152			if (highest_perf != cur_perf.highest_perf && !cpudata->hw_prefcore) {
   153				pr_err("%s cpu%d highest=%d %d highest perf doesn't match\n",
   154					__func__, cpu, highest_perf, cpudata->perf.highest_perf);
   155				return -EINVAL;
   156			}
   157			if (nominal_perf != cur_perf.nominal_perf ||
   158			   (lowest_nonlinear_perf != cur_perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf) ||
   159			   (lowest_perf != cur_perf.lowest_perf)) {
   160				pr_err("%s cpu%d nominal=%d %d lowest_nonlinear=%d %d lowest=%d %d, they should be equal!\n",
   161					__func__, cpu, nominal_perf, cpudata->perf.nominal_perf,
   162					lowest_nonlinear_perf, cpudata->perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf,
   163					lowest_perf, cpudata->perf.lowest_perf);
   164				return -EINVAL;
   165			}
   166	
   167			if (!((highest_perf >= nominal_perf) &&
   168				(nominal_perf > lowest_nonlinear_perf) &&
   169				(lowest_nonlinear_perf >= lowest_perf) &&
   170				(lowest_perf > 0))) {
   171				pr_err("%s cpu%d highest=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > lowest=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
   172					__func__, cpu, highest_perf, nominal_perf,
   173					lowest_nonlinear_perf, lowest_perf);
   174				return -EINVAL;
   175			}
   176		}
   177	
   178		return 0;
   179	}
   180	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-17 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-15  0:52 [PATCH v2 00/17] amd-pstate cleanups Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Show a warning when a CPU fails to setup Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17  5:53   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop min and max cached frequencies Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17  6:38   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-17 21:06     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move perf values into a union Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17  9:01   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Overhaul locking Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17  9:12   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop `cppc_cap1_cached` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17  9:12   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Use _free macro to free put policy Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 10:11   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Allow lowest nonlinear and lowest to be the same Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 10:14   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Drop SUCCESS and FAIL enums Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 11:34   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Continue on missing policies Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 11:38   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-17 17:04     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Adjust variable scope for amd_pstate_ut_check_freq() Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 11:39   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 13:48   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-17 17:12   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache CPPC request in shared mem case too Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 13:54   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move all EPP tracing into *_update_perf and *_set_epp functions Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 14:14   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Update cppc_req_cached for shared mem EPP writes Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 14:30   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop debug statements for policy setting Mario Limonciello
2025-02-17 14:31   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Rework CPPC enabling Mario Limonciello
2025-02-15  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Stop caching EPP Mario Limonciello

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202502180139.g2a2yoPe-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=superm1@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox