public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
To: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com"
	<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/16] x86/mce: Remove __mcheck_cpu_init_early()
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 10:53:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250219155317.GA337534@yaz-khff2.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY8PR11MB7134FBAFC4CC37B06C9AE7ED89FA2@CY8PR11MB7134.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:00:12AM +0000, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote:
> > From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
> > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 12:46 AM
> > To: x86@kernel.org; Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-edac@vger.kernel.org;
> > Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com; Yazen Ghannam
> > <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 06/16] x86/mce: Remove __mcheck_cpu_init_early()
> > 
> > The __mcheck_cpu_init_early() function was introduced so that some
> > vendor-specific features are detected before the first MCA polling event done
> > in __mcheck_cpu_init_generic().
> > 
> > Currently, __mcheck_cpu_init_early() is only used on AMD-based systems
> > and additional code will be needed to support various system configurations.
> > 
> > However, the current and future vendor-specific code should be done during
> > vendor init. This keeps all the vendor code in a common location and
> > simplifies the generic init flow.
> > 
> > Move all the __mcheck_cpu_init_early() code into mce_amd_feature_init().
> > Also, move __mcheck_cpu_init_generic() after
> > __mcheck_cpu_init_prepare_banks() so that MCA is enabled after the first
> > MCA polling event.
> 
> Maybe providing a bit more information about the first MCA polling event, 
> as shown below, would be clearer:
> 
>    "... so that MCA is enabled after the first MCA polling event for the machine 
>     checks left over from the previous reset."
> 

Sure thing.

> > Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
> 
> Other than that,
> 
>     Reviewed-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
>   

Thanks,
Yazen

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-19 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-13 16:45 [PATCH v2 00/16] AMD MCA interrupts rework Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] x86/mce: Don't remove sysfs if thresholding sysfs init fails Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-17  6:58   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] x86/mce/amd: Remove return value for mce_threshold_create_device() Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-17  7:11   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-17 14:09     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] x86/mce/amd: Remove smca_banks_map Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-17  7:57   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-17 14:17     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] x86/mce/amd: Put list_head in threshold_bank Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  1:28   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] x86/mce: Cleanup bank processing on init Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 22:32   ` Luck, Tony
2025-02-17 13:55     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18 16:40       ` Luck, Tony
2025-02-18  2:15   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] x86/mce: Remove __mcheck_cpu_init_early() Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  3:00   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 15:53     ` Yazen Ghannam [this message]
2025-02-27 15:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-27 16:31     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-27 19:33       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-27 19:59         ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-27 20:48           ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 14:29             ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] x86/mce: Define BSP-only init Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  3:16   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 15:57     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-20  1:37       ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-20 14:36         ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-24 13:28           ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] x86/mce: Define BSP-only SMCA init Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  3:33   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:01     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] x86/mce: Do 'UNKNOWN' vendor check early Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  5:31   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] x86/mce: Separate global and per-CPU quirks Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  6:03   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:06     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-20  1:27       ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-20 14:37         ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] x86/mce: Move machine_check_poll() status checks to helper functions Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  6:29   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] x86/mce: Unify AMD THR handler with MCA Polling Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  6:42   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:07     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] x86/mce: Unify AMD DFR " Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  7:37   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:09     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-20  1:41       ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-20 14:41         ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-24 13:31           ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] x86/mce/amd: Enable interrupt vectors once per-CPU on SMCA systems Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  8:23   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:16     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] x86/mce/amd: Support SMCA Corrected Error Interrupt Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 22:34   ` Luck, Tony
2025-02-17 14:06     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18 13:27   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:19     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] x86/mce: Handle AMD threshold interrupt storms Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18 13:51   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 22:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] AMD MCA interrupts rework Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250219155317.GA337534@yaz-khff2.amd.com \
    --to=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox