From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
lkmm@lists.linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@gmail.com,
will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk,
luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com,
Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH memory-model 4/7] tools/memory-model: Define applicable tags on operation in tools/...
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:14:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220161403.800831-4-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cfb51e3-9726-4285-b8ca-0d0abcacb07e@paulmck-laptop>
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Herd7 transforms reads, writes, and read-modify-writes by eliminating
'acquire tags from writes, 'release tags from reads, and 'acquire,
'release, and 'mb tags from failed read-modify-writes. We emulate this
behavior by redefining Acquire, Release, and Mb sets in linux-kernel.bell
to explicitly exclude those combinations.
Herd7 furthermore adds 'noreturn tag to certain reads. Currently herd7
does not allow specifying the 'noreturn tag manually, but such manual
declaration (e.g., through a syntax __atomic_op{noreturn}) would add
invalid 'noreturn tags to writes; in preparation, we already also exclude
this combination.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
index dba6b5b6dee01..7c9ae48b94377 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
+++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell
@@ -36,6 +36,17 @@ enum Barriers = 'wmb (*smp_wmb*) ||
'after-srcu-read-unlock (*smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock*)
instructions F[Barriers]
+
+(*
+ * Filter out syntactic annotations that do not provide the corresponding
+ * semantic ordering, such as Acquire on a store or Mb on a failed RMW.
+ *)
+let FailedRMW = RMW \ (domain(rmw) | range(rmw))
+let Acquire = Acquire \ W \ FailedRMW
+let Release = Release \ R \ FailedRMW
+let Mb = Mb \ FailedRMW
+let Noreturn = Noreturn \ W
+
(* SRCU *)
enum SRCU = 'srcu-lock || 'srcu-unlock || 'sync-srcu
instructions SRCU[SRCU]
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-20 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-20 16:13 [PATCH memory-model 0/7] LKMM updates for v6.15 Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_and()/or()/xor() and add_negative Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 2/7] tools/memory-model: Add atomic_andnot() with its variants Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:13 ` [PATCH memory-model 3/7] tools/memory-model: Legitimize current use of tags in LKMM macros Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 5/7] tools/memory-model: Define effect of Mb tags on RMWs in tools/ Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 6/7] tools/memory-model: Switch to softcoded herd7 tags Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-25 4:24 ` Akira Yokosawa
2025-02-25 7:40 ` Hernan Ponce de Leon
2025-02-20 16:14 ` [PATCH memory-model 7/7] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-25 4:28 ` Akira Yokosawa
2025-02-25 18:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250220161403.800831-4-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkmm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox