public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 6/9] mm/damon: add default allow/reject behavior fields to struct damos
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:35:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220193509.36379-7-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250220193509.36379-1-sj@kernel.org>

It is more intuitive to decide the default filtering stage allow/reject
behavior as opposite to the last filter's behavior.  The decision should
be made separately for core and operations layers' filtering stages,
since last core layer-handled filter is not really a last filter if
there are operations layer handling filters.

Keeping separate decisions for the two categories can make the logic
simpler.  Add fields for string the two decisions.

Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/damon.h | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
index add82fdc1117..1d8479f57f85 100644
--- a/include/linux/damon.h
+++ b/include/linux/damon.h
@@ -497,6 +497,9 @@ struct damos {
 	unsigned long next_apply_sis;
 	/* informs if ongoing DAMOS walk for this scheme is finished */
 	bool walk_completed;
+	/* whether to reject core/ops filters umatched regions */
+	bool core_filters_default_reject;
+	bool ops_filters_default_reject;
 /* public: */
 	struct damos_quota quota;
 	struct damos_watermarks wmarks;
-- 
2.39.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-20 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-20 19:35 [RFC PATCH 0/9] mm/damon: make allow filters after reject filters useful and intuitive SeongJae Park
2025-02-20 19:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] mm/damon/core: introduce damos->ops_filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-20 19:35 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] mm/damon/paddr: support ops_filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-20 19:35 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] mm/damon/core: support committing ops_filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-20 19:35 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] mm/damon/core: put ops-handled filters to damos->ops_filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-20 19:35 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] mm/damon/paddr: support only ops_filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-20 19:35 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-02-20 19:35 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] mm/damon/core: set damos_filter default allowance behavior based on installed filters SeongJae Park
2025-02-27  0:29   ` SeongJae Park
2025-02-20 19:35 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] mm/damon/paddr: respect ops_filters_default_reject SeongJae Park
2025-02-20 19:35 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] Docs/mm/damon/design: update for changed filter-default behavior SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250220193509.36379-7-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox